Thursday, October 29, 2020

America's 2020 Presidential election, Kristallnacht--and the danger of being a Jew in the US


 In just a few days, on November 3, 2020, voting stations in America will "officially" open (many have already opened for 'early voting'). Americans will choose their next President--by either re-electing Republican Donald Trump, or by replacing him with Democrat Joe Biden.

This election will be different. For one thing, unlike some past elections, this election may set a modern record for total votes cast. Already, a week before voting stations officially open, millions of Americans have cast their votes. So far (as of October 29th), more than 77 million votes have been cast (here).

This extraordinary tally (for this year's early vote) suggests that Americans know what's at stake in this election. Both Parties--Republican and Democrat--claim that if the opposing candidate wins, he will destroy America.

Is this true? We don't know. But the record number of votes already cast in the US suggests that members of both Parties believe this to be true. 

Members of both Parties who are voting in this election say they vote because they want to preserve the nation's soul. We just don't know which soul will be preserved--the Democrat's definition of 'soul', or the Republican's definition.

Meanwhile, the majority of US Jews vote, too. But will their vote be plagued by two potentially dangerous beliefs? 

It's possible. The first of these two beliefs is what US voters call, "Liberalism" (here). This could endanger US Jews because "Liberalism" and "Jewish" don't always go together. Yet, some 56% of US Jews identify themselves as "leaning towards Liberal"--or, as "Liberal" (here). If that's true, we can easily assume that US Jews will tend to vote for the most Liberal of the two main Parties in this election--the Democrat Party. After all, the only large US political Party that embraces a Liberal agenda in the US is the Democrat Party. Republicans, by contrast, are called, "Conservative". Republicans are decidedly not "Liberal".

As suggested above, this Jewish commitment to a Liberal political agenda for America might not be good for Jews. The reason for this seems simple enough: a truly Leftist-Liberal political environment is not always good for Jews. In America, for example, it is no accident that, as the Left has become more prominent on the political stage, two things have happened. First, America has become increasingly polarized. Second, anti-Semitism has increased--dramatically (here). This has happened because America's most Liberal writers and politicians have embraced a bevy of anti-Jewish notions--the  Boycott, Divestment and Sanction Movement; the anti-Zionist demonization of Israel as a pariah, illegitimate state; intersectionality (which apparently  believes that all kinds of  ills--including Zionism--must be purged to achieve a more perfect society); and a radicalized feminism which is fundamentally anti-Zionist (here). The more commonplace these ideas become on college campuses, in published essays and in intellectual journals, the more polarized the US becomes--and the more demonized Jews and Israel become. The result? Dramatically increased antisemitism in the US, mostly--but not exclusively--from the Left.

Liberalism and antisemitism connect for another reason: Liberalism is at heart an idea based upon utopia. Liberals promote a utopian, ideal world. Major elements of the modern utopian ideal even appear in the 2020 Democrat election Platform: "racial justice", "leveling the economic playing field" (here), guaranteed safe housing for all, universal healthcare, ending poverty, gun control,  "affordable" education and economic security for all (ibid).

But utopias are--by their very nature--dangerous for Jews. Every utopia in the West has been the same: Jews lose. Even the very first iteration of a social utopia, in Thomas More's 16th century work, Utopia, the perfect society was completely Jew-free. That sentiment has never changed.

No large-scale Western utopian society--most notably Nazi Germany and Communist Russia--treated Jews very well. The same might be true in a now-polarized America (here). That is, the more America polarizes around a Left-Right axis, the greater becomes America's antisemitism (ibid)--partly because anti-Israelism plays so prominent a role in so much Leftist-Liberal rhetoric.

Today, the assumption that Jews will again vote Democrat is supported by a recent poll on the subject. In a Pew survey completed in mid-October, 2020, some 70% of Jews indicated they will indeed vote for the Democrat/Liberal candidate, Biden (here). 

Biden certainly appears to lean Left. He certainly appears to embrace a far-Left political agenda just when antisemitism in American increases. Will a Left-leaning Biden be good to Jews? One answer comes from one of the most anti-Jew Members of the US Congress--Ilhan Omar. She has recently declared that she--and other Leftists in Congress--fully expects Biden to move Left as US President. She also stated that she and her 'colleagues' will "press" Biden to do just that (here). 

Given the history of Liberals-their-utopia-and-the-Jews, it seems dangerous for the majority of America's Jews to vote for a Liberal-utopian political agenda especially when the most Leftist Members of the US Congress now threaten to stall Biden's entire Congressional agenda if he does not 'fall in line' (ibid). Ilhan Omar and her friends will not be the Jews' friend. Their political histories proves that.

There is a second potentially dangerous belief Jews will bring to the voting booth next week--their attitudes towards antisemitism. According to the most recent AJC survey of antisemitism in the US, 54% of American Jews say they believe that Republicans (and, by association, Trump) bear the responsibility for today's antisemitism in the US (here). The media (here) supports this conceit. These same Democrat Jews do not believe the Democrat Party is to blame for America's anti-semitism (ibid). 

Could the majority of US Jews be wrong to believe that it is Republicans who truly foster and support today's antisemitism?

Only 12% of US Jews believe that Democrats are responsible for antisemitism in the US. Antisemitism is no small concern for US Jews. In today's America, 88% of US Jews believe that antisemitism in the US is a problem (ibid). That's a big number--88%. It suggests that  Jews see antisemitism as a daily concern--and daily concerns do motivate voters.

So, when US Jews overwhelmingly see antisemitism as a problem, to whom will they turn for help? Do they turn to Republican politicians--whom they see as responsible for US antisemitism? Of course not. They turn to the Democrat Party, whom they view as primarily innocent when it comes to American antisemitism.

That comforts a lot a people. But then, what happens if these Jews are wrong? What happens if the greater threat to Jews in America is actually from the Left, and from Democrats specifically who have often appeared to support the Left's violence in America (here), (here), (here). 

Certainly, it is Democrats, not Republicans, who support the likes of (Democrats) llhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and AOC, each of whom has said some questionable things about Israel and Jews. If Biden wins, these women  could well become players in the new Democrat Administration.

Do Biden-friendly Jews believe they will be safer with such individuals in positions of power? True, many in America believe that, in a Biden Administration, Jews will not be safer. But then, the people who believe this are not Democrats.

Then, there's the issue of the US's Orthodox Jews. Orthodox Jews in the US will not vote for  Biden. Another recent poll says that 83% of Orthodox Jews will not vote for a Democrat. They will vote for Republican Trump in the 2020 election (here). 

How can this be? Either the 70% non-Orthodox Jews who will vote Democrat are wrong, or the 83% of Orthodox who vote Trump are wrong. They can't both be right.

Remember, Democrats--and pro-Democrat advocates--seem very sure that Donald Trump is an antisemite (here). Would Orthodox Jews--so potentially sensitive to antisemitism because they are so easily identified as Jewish (how they dress and where they live)--really vote for an antisemite?

I don't think so. As a matter of human nature, most people do not generally vote for those whom they--the voter--believe hate them. So, what do US Orthodox Jews know that their non-Orthodox peers don't know--or, more likely, prefer not to see?

One answer to this question might be summed up with one word: riots. 

Recall for a moment the street riots Americans saw (if they were looking) during the height of the corona pandemic during June-July-August, 2020.  Most news outlets didn't report how badly some Jewish neighborhoods were attacked during these riots. The news outlets ignored those attacks. 

Nevertheless, it is altogether possible that these riots, on pause now during the run-up to the election, will revive. Make no mistake. These riots have been fueled and encouraged by Democrat leaders, both local and national (here and here).  If the riots renew, they could spill into residential neighborhoods. They could spill into Jewish neighborhoods. 

Is it realistic to believe the riots will renew? Ask the FBI, which has already warned Jewish institutions in the US to "brace for possible violence around election day, no matter who wins" (here).

How will local, state and national Democrat leaders deal with these new riots? Will they call them "peaceful protests"--as they'd done this past summer? Will they say "protesting" is a sanctified right of of a democratic nation--and must therefore not be stopped? Will they stand in solidarity with the protesters, as they had done this past summer? Will they say any police interference in these "protests" is fascist?

We will soon find out. 

The likeliest time-frame for renewed rioting in the US could be the time-period just after the election, perhaps between November 4 and November 28, 2020. For Jews, these dates are fraught with historical significance. 

On November 9-10, 1939 in Germany, there occurred an event called, Kristallnacht ("the night of the broken glass) that unfolded across Germany. During the 48 hours of November 9-10,1939, violent mobs, spurred by antisemitic exhortations, plundered 7,500 Jewish businesses, homes and schools. These mobs set afire hundreds of Jewish synagogues (here), destroying them. 

Looking back, this Kristallnacht marked a turning point in Nazi behavior towards Jews. After November 9-10,1939, there was shift in the way Jews were treated. Before November 9, anti-Jew activities were (according to some) primarily verbal.  But after November 10, 1939, that rhetorical abuse turned to outright violence against Jews--a violence that helped prepare Germany for the Holocaust (ibid).

During November, 2020, will US Jews see their own Kristallnacht? You tell me.

 In the meantime, isn't it time US Jews considered aliyah?






Thursday, October 22, 2020

Yes, Israel has a "peace" problem--and a 'democracy' problem


 Israel's President, Reuven Rivlin, recently said that this year--2020--"has been a year of peace" (here). On one level, he was correct. But on another level, he was dead wrong.

Rivlin made his "year of peace" comment because of the Abraham Peace Accord. This Accord was announced on August 13, 2020 as a diplomatic and business "normalization" agreement between Israel, the UAE (and then, later, Bahrain). This agreement was historic. It did the supposedly impossible: it brought Jews and Muslims together--in peace. 

That alone could qualify 2020 as a 'year of peace'. A "Normalization" between Jew and Muslim? Since Israel's modern founding in 1948, such a 'normalizing' peace had never been attempted. Never.

This agreement was so stunning, it immediately suggested a redefining of the diplomatic and economic maps of the Middle East. If the innovation and high-tech sophistication of Israel could truly be matched up with the money, contacts and energy of wealthy Arab nations, this deal could transform the Middle East. It could bring modernity, prosperity and increased security to a region more commonly known for its backwardness, tribal conflicts and extensive poverty. An Israel-based non-Iranian confederation could potentially create an entirely new Middle East.

This Accord also has the potential to create substantial peace dividends. One of biggest of these dividends was the possible inclusion into this nascent "confederation" the Middle East's biggest player--Saudi Arabia. 

Saudi Arabia isn't just the largest country in the Middle East. It's got the largest economy of the Middle East. If the Saudis joined with Israel, UAE and Bahrain, the resulting confederation could change the Middle East from a Russia-leaning Region to a Western-leaning Region. Certainly, with Israel acting as its high-tech hub, the Middle East could become the world's greatest science-driven engine.

The timing of this agreement was extraordinary. At this moment in history, the EU teeters on collapse and the US teeters on either some form of Marxism or outright revolution--or both. If both the EU and the US do sink into some kind of political and/or economic chaos, this Jewish-Muslim "confederation" could replace the US and EU as the world's greatest creator of growth, innovation and prosperity. 

But...this prospect for peace and prosperity can only come true if Israel survives its internal wars. Right now, that survival  is not guaranteed. There is some evidence to suggest that Israel could drown under a tsunami of Jew vs Jew hatred (here). 

You see, the truth is, Israel doesn't have a war problem. It's got a "peace" problem. 

Israel has a unique track record fighting wars against external enemies. Israel has always won its wars with external enemies--mostly because it cannot afford to lose. Israel's problem is, it has trouble with peace. 

In general, Israelis unify for war. They're good at doing that. But Israelis fracture when they have no external war to fight.

That is, when no enemy threatens an imminent invasion of Israel, Israelis seem to turn on each other. This is what we see (now almost daily) being reported in Israel's news media.  

 Currently, Israel has experienced an "official peace" for more than 6 years, since the end of the 2014 war with Gaza. How have Israelis chosen to use this time of relative calm? They've gone to war against each other, Jew against Jew. 

Leftists gather in coffee shops and salons to plan to undermine and attack everything Zionists and Religious Zionists do in Israel. Meanwhile, other Jews who are not Leftist--but who appear to have problems with Judaism--plot to attack everything they see as "Jewish" in Israel. 

We see these two groups work to demonize and verbally attack Israel's Ultra-Religious Jews. Why? I believe many within these two groups believe that Israel's Ultra-Religious (the 'Haredi' sector) are Israel's scapegoat. At least, that's how they act.

Perhaps some Jews in Israel tire of being the world's scapegoat. Since many of these Jews profess to 'want to be like everyone else', perhaps they yearn to have a scapegoat of their own--like everyone else has. Perhaps that's why Israel's Haredi are being treated as a hated scapegoat. 

Perhaps. 

By the way, this Israeli inability to live in peace with itself isn't new. Read our TanachOur Jewish history is scarred by this Jewish tendency for internecine warfare. Israel today is no different than ancient Israel.

Is the Abraham Accord compelling enough to change that? Can it change Israel's penchant for internal warfare?

Once the business and tourism benefits of the Accord begin, will Israelis drop their political hatreds and dream instead of greater prosperity and international respect?  

Or, are we looking at something else entirely: do today's divisions reveal that Israel has lost its moral compass? Has the world's only Jewish state lost its Jewish compass?

Is that why we see this Jew-vs-Jew behavior? We don't know--and frankly, I don't think Israelis know.

Reading Israel's news, it looks to me like Israelis aren't ready for peace right now. I don't  believe the prospect of a "new Middle East" is a powerful enough motivator for Israelis to be interested in building a better future. Right now, Israelis seem instead more focused on undermining Israel's democracy by attempting to take Israel's democratically-elected Prime Minister out of office through protests--and demanding to do that because, 'democracy' (here).

The Abraham Accord brings with it a potential for a new future. But all Israel can think about right now is the double plague of corona and Netanyahu-hate. 

Peace? Forget it. Israel must protect its democracy. Yes, Netanyahu is indeed so bad a Prime Minister, his corona failures endanger all (here). Israel must remove this democratically-elected man before the next election!!

Was Israel president Rivlin correct? Does the Abraham Accord really bring to Israel the stunning opportunity for real Middle East peace?

Or, was Rivlin wrong? Are Israelis so intent on destroying Netanyahu they would overturn Israel's democracy--for our 'greater good'? Have Israelis so blinded themselves with political hatred that they see no reason whatsoever to think about preparing Israel to take its place as the keystone piece in a new Middle East/Western-leaning confederation? 

Is this what's going on here in Israel? We don't know. Israelis don't know. 

Ready or not, Israel's future lies before us. That future will be either very bright--or very dark.

Yes, Israel has problems, all right. Can Israelis figure out how to solve them? 

You tell me.



Thursday, October 15, 2020

US and Israeli polls: are pre-election polls still credible?



 With a US Presidential election now less than three weeks away,  some in Israel took note when a recent news article in an Israeli news outlet (here) reported that US Presidential candidate, Joe Biden, led US President Donald Trump by 14 points in the latest nbc/wsj pre-election poll. Since most Israelis appear to favor US President Donald Trump over Biden (here), such a US poll result means something in Israel. 

Since that article, more US polls have begun to show a widening lead for Biden. The realclearpolitics US poll average now (as of October 14, 2020) shows Biden with a full 10% average lead--across all polls in the US. This suggests that Donald Trump's re-election hopes are probably doomed. Is this true?

One reader of that Israeli article cited above didn't believe the nbc/wsj poll results. In a comment to the article, this reader wrote that the poll was biased because it showed that 46% of poll respondents were Democrats, while only 35% respondents were Republicans.  This 11-point gap in respondent Party affiliation suggested that, even before poll phone-callers began dialing to respondents, Biden appeared to have a built-in advantage.

Why? Because in America today, voters are extraordinarily polarized. Something like 84%-86% of Democrats appear to be hard-core Biden 'advocates', and a similar percent of Republicans appear to be hard-core Trump supporters. 

Such polarization predisposes Democrat respondents to prefer Biden exclusively. It also suggests that Republicans can be expected to remain equally loyal to Trump. 

There appears to be no middle road for voters in today's America. There could be very few voters of either Party who will next month choose to vote for the candidate of the other Party. At least, that's what pundits and politicians believe.

Therefore, given the extreme polarization that exists between Democrats and Republicans in the US during this current election cycle, an 11-point poll oversampling (in favor of Democrats) could indeed suggest a wide gap in voter preference. Not surprisingly, this is exactly what the poll showed. 

But was that Israeli reader (who had pointed out this 11-point Party affiliation gap) really correct? Did nbc/wsj pollsters really tilt respondents chosen for this poll so heavily towards Democrats as to set the stage for a heavily pro-Biden result? 

We got an answer to this question from nbcnews itself. Some 6 days after the nbc/wsj poll came out, nbcnews confirmed that there had indeed been a weighting bias in this poll. The bias favored Biden. But that bias was not, as the Israeli reader had written, an 11-point Biden advantage. This nbcnews article called that bias a 9-point advantage. 

From what most US poll readers knew from past poll reports, this 9-point advantage was greater than the more "normal" US polling tradition of showing a 5-6 point poll oversampling in favor of Democrats. Then, just to give further confirmation to this oversampling 'incident', another article (here) declared that the oversampling of Democrats in this poll had been 8%. 

To understand how serious such a poll oversampling is, consider that, within Gallup pre-US election polls between early March, 2020 and September 13, 2020, the differences between Democrat-Republican Party affiliations fluctuated between 0% to 7% (favoring Democrats), depending upon the poll (here). Most Gallup polls during this 5.5 -month period carried a 3%-5% advantage--to Democrats. Compared to these numbers, a suddenly appearing 8% or 9% advantage is, shall we say, unusual.  

The differences may appear small. But they aren't. If, say, Republicans represent 26% of poll respondents, and Democrats represent 34% of total respondents, this 8-point difference represents a 30+ percent advantage for Democrats (that is, an 8-point advantage for Democrats translates into a 30 percent advantage for Democrats--because the "34" number for Democrats is 30% more than the Republican's "26" number). A point advantage (between, say, 26% and 35%) represents a 34+ percent advantage for Democrats (that "35" number is 34% bigger than "26")

With potentially 130 million Americans voting in November 2020, what would a 30%-34% pre-election poll advantage mean for an actual election result? Well, a poll is supposed to give one a 'sense' of how final voting results will end up, right? So, an 8-9 point poll advantage seems to suggest 30%-34%  more votes for Biden.

If Biden really did get 30%-34% more votes than Trump in the  November 2020 election, that would mean anywhere between 25-to-40 million more votes for Biden. That kind of election result would indeed be termed a "landslide" for Biden. 

So far, no one in America's mainstream media claims a landslide for Biden. The fact that no mainstream news outlet right now is calling for a Biden landslide suggests that these outlandish poll numbers might in fact be more propaganda than fact. 

Some in America believe that Biden is winning the hearts-and-minds of voters only in the media--and in faked "polls" (here).  Others say something's missing from these polls (here). 

What do inaccurate polls in the US suggest? That voters are being lied to? 

More important for us in Israel, the American possibility that polls are more propaganda than fact begs an Israeli poll question: how inaccurate are Israel's polls?

For example, how much oversampling of respondents do Israeli polls use? What percent of Israeli poll respondents are committed Netanyahu-haters? How often do Israeli polls print results as suspect as the nbc/wsj poll above?

No one in Israel knows the answer to these questions. 

Do Israeli polls attempt to ferret out oversampling biases? Do Israeli polls attempt to test for respondent hatred toward one or another candidate? Do Israeli polls attempt to make sure there's a balance between respondent Party affiliations?

No one in Israel knows. Or, if they do know, they aren't talking.

These questions are important because there is arguably as much hate spewed by media elites and politicians against Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel as against Trump in America. As we see in America, Israel is also extraordinarily polarized (here). 

With so much hate driving voter passions, how can voters in either country get an accurate sense of a candidate's electability if polls in both countries don't 'correct' for hatred--or, at the very least, account for poll biases and oversampling?

Shouldn't voters in both countries be told if a poll contains an oversampling--or any kind of respondent bias? Shouldn't voters in both countries be told if a poll has used unusual (and perhaps flawed) assumptions/methodologies specifically to support one candidate over another (here)?

If polls never offer such information, polls risk losing credibility. Especially during times when intense passions drive an election, citizens in both Israel and the US need more than simple poll results. We need information about poll respondent Party affiliation. We need information about respondent biases. We need information about poll biases. We need information about poll assumptions and methodologies. We need information about what a poll might be missing (here). Otherwise, who could trust any poll?

Voters in both countries deserve better information. Just don't bet on them getting that information.

Monday, October 5, 2020

An imitation Dr Seuss poem with a Sukkot "secret"


Dr Seuss is about words, rhyme--and joy. The words of a Dr Seuss poem, combined with the poem's rhyme and a song-like quality to those words all add up to joy. At least, that--that sense of joy--is how my own children--and grandchildren--have reacted to a typical Dr Seuss poem. 

I don't think I'm alone to use the words, 'joy' and 'Dr Seuss' in the same sentence. The Dr Seuss's books have sold more than 600 million copies worldwide. These books are read and loved by many.

Now, our Succot holiday is this week. Succot is the "season of our joy" (as our Succot prayers so often remind us). Therefore, I thought it appropriate to share with you a Dr Seuss imitation poem that contains--of all things--a "secret" (perhaps) about your own Sukkah. 

First, here is the poem. Later, I'll tell you about that "secret". 

By the way, as you read this poem, you'll see numbers that appear to look like footnotes. For the moment, please ignore those numbers. I'll explain later (you can find the source of this poem below the poem).




 Now, about those numbers that look like footnotes--and about that "secret" I mentioned at the beginning of this post.

First: keep in mind that those numbers lead you to that "secret"--which isn't such a secret after all.

Second: those numbers are indeed footnotes! But to what?

Each footnote leads you to information--with sources cited--about the Halachic rules for building a Sukkah! That is to say, the poem, while  fun to read and easy to enjoy, is also a shorthand representation of where, how and even when one can build a Sukkah according to Jewish law. This poem, in other words, is a teaching lesson for Halachic Sukkah building. Did you know Torah could be such fun to learn?

You might even discover something from these footnotes about your own Sukkah which, perhaps, you didn't already know.

This poem, then, isn't just about having some Holiday fun. Like all Dr Seuss poems, this one teaches something--a lesson in how to build a Sukkah  according to Jewish law.

Take a look at the footnotes below:



Please note. I have done some light editing of the original footnote text from the poem's author, Rabbi Arthur Gould. My editing shows up in [brackets]. I have also added a few commas,  to help with clarity--and one spelling correction (I changed "tepach"/tepachim" to "tefach/tefachim"): 


    1. Maimonides (RMBM) [in the text] Mishne Torah, Hilchot Sukkah, Chapter 4, Section 1. The minimum height of a Sukkah is 10 tefachim. A tefach is a measure of the width of the four fingers of one's hand. My hand is 3 1/4 inches wide for a minimum Sukkah height of 32 1/2 inches. The minimum allowable width is 7 tefachim by 7 tefachim. This would result in a [kosher] Sukkah [as small as] 22 3/4 inches by 22 3/4 inches.

    2. The maximum height [for a kosher Sukkah] is 20 Amot. An Amah is the length from the elbow to the tip of the middle finger. My [own personal] Amah is 15 1/2 inches. [This would mean]...a maximum [Sukkah] height of 25 feet. Others say that 30 feet is the maximum [for a kosher Sukkah].

    3. According to RMBM, [a kosher] Sukkah can be built to a width of several miles. Shulchan Aruch also says there is no limit on the size of [a Sukkah's] width.

    4. RMBM, [in] Hilchot Sukkah, Chapter 4, Section 6.

    5. RMBM, Hilchot Sukkah, Chapter 4, Section 11. RMBM states that one may construct a [kosher] Sukkah by wedging poles in the four corners of [a flat] roof [that has a wall around that roof (to keep people from falling off the roof)] and [then] suspending scakh [a Sukkah's roof material] from [those] poles. The walls of the building underneath [the Sukkah roof] are considered [halachically]to [actually reach],,,upward to the edge of the [roof] scakh [even though there might actually be only air between the top of that low roof-wall and the Sukkah roof; Please confirm with your local Orthodox Rabbi to confirm that my clarifications here (and throughout this essay) are indeed correct].

    6. RMBM, Hilchot Sukkah, Chapter 4, Section 8-10 discusses the ins and outs of building your Sukkah in an alley or passageway

    7. There is a [discussion] in the Talmud [that refers to an Ashtarot Karnayim. According to [that] discussion, [an Ashtarot Karnayim is a phrase used to describe] two hills, with a valley in between where the Sun does not reach. [This discussion] is from] Talmud Bavli, Sukkot 2a. (Thanks to the miracle of the Internet, Rabbi Joshua Strulowitz (of Congregation Adath Israel in San Francisco) commented on this line, which now reads correctly). The halacha is that you can build your Sukkah in [an] Ashtarot Karnayim, or other places where the sun does not reach the Sukkah because of artificial impediments, provided that if the impediment (sic) were removed, shade from the sun would come to the scakh...

    8. RMBM, Hilchot Sukkah, Chapter 4, Section 6. You can go into a Sukkah built on a wagon or a ship even on Yom Tov.

    9. RMBM, Hilchot Sukkah, Chapter 4, Section 6. OK, RMBM says a camel--but 'dragon' rhymes with 'wagon' a lot better, don't you agree. Anyway, RMBM says you can build your Sukkah on a wagon or in the crown of a tree, but [the law is] you can't go into it on Yom Tov[:] [t]here is a general rule against riding a beast or ascending into the crown of a tree on Yom Tov.

    10. Chapter 5 [RMBM?] deals with...rules for the scakh [roof material]. Basically, you can use that which has grown from the ground, and is [now] completely detached from the ground. So, for example, you cannot bend the branches of a tree over the Sukkah to form the scakh. But you can cut the branches from a tree and [then] use them as scakh.

    11. This wasn't clear, so I have skipped it. I believe the essence of this footnote is that per the halacha cited in footnote 10, you cannot create a roof for a Sukkah by using branches one has bent. To be kosher for a Sukkah roof, branches have to be cut--that is, completely detached--from a  tree.   

    12. Shulchan Aruch, Hilchot Sukkah, Perek 636, Section 1 The Sukkah should not be built sooner than 30 days before the Hag [the Holiday--in this case , Succot]. However, if the structure is built prior to 30 days, as long as something new is added within the 30 days, the Sukkah is kosher.

    13. Of course it's a well known rule that you must sit in the shade from the roof of the Sukkah and not in the shade that may be cast by the walls. It seems that this might affect the height of the walls, depending on the longitude of the location where you are building your Sukkah.

    14. Traditionally, women, servants and minors are patur [exempt]from the Mitzvah of Sukkah. In our day, we hope we know better than to [exclude] half the Jewish people from the observance of Mitzvot. Of course, that's just a personal opinion of the author.

    15. RMBM, ibid, Chapter 6, Section 6 explains that you should eat, drink and live in the Sukkah for the 7 days, as you [would] live in your own home. One should not even take a nap outside of the Sukkah.

    16. RMBM, ibid, Section 10[:] If it rains one should go into the house. How does one know if it is raining hard enough? If sufficient raindrops fall through the scakh and into the food so that the food is spoiled - go inside!


    Credits: Rules of the Sukkah by Rabbi Arthur E. Gould

    Infographic by www.sukkahworld.com



    From Tuvia Brodie:   Happy Succot!!!!!!

Thursday, October 1, 2020

Is this where Israel's New Corona World Order begins?

 

Do you know what unhappiness is? I'll tell you what it is: it's working 4 or 5 hours in a single sitting to write an essay and then, with the stroke of a badly placed knuckle, inadvertently hitting a key that erases the entire essay. 

Oy!

I have no idea what key that errant knuckle hit, but that knuckle did hit a key. The essay instantly disappeared. The only thing left behind for me to see was the title, above.

Oy! You can surely bet that left me very unhappy. 

Now. I have a second question for you. Do you know what real unhappiness is? I'll tell you what it is: it's erasing 4-5 hours of work--a  completed essay, no less--only to mess up your attempt to undo your mistake.

Yes, I also did that. That is, I tried to undo my mistake--to recapture the essay. But I didn't know what I didn't know. I didn't remember exactly how to undo what I had done. So I did it badly.

I thought I knew how to recapture my essay. I was wrong. Very wrong.   

Now, I believe the essay's loss is permanent. Oy!  

Double Oy!

So. If any of you know how to recapture a lost or erased essay, please let me know. I will appreciate that.

I will leave this window open as I shut down my computer so that I can, hopefully, 'restore' the open page when I next start my computer. Perhaps that will preserve (in some way) my ability to recapture the essay.

Oy! I can't believe I've done this!

But I did!

Ugh!