Last updated: June 30, 2014
If you have
been following recent news reports about the kidnapping of three Jewish boys
from Israel, you will know that the European Union (EU) and the United Nations
(UN) have both condemned the kidnapping. You might also know that the EU and
the UN have warned Israel that its behaviour in its search for the boys might
subject it to accusations of war crimes.
But what the
EU and the UN have not told you is that actual war crimes have already
been committed in this incident. They remain silent about some very real war
crimes, crimes against humanity and the possibility of a genocide crime. They focus
only on Israel’s possible war crimes. Why?
The war crimes
were committed by Arabs.
The EU and
the UN refuse to label Arab actions as prosecutable war crimes and crimes
against humanity—as defined in The Rome Statutes (see below). This refusal to
‘call out’ Arab war crimes marks the EU and UN as dishonest brokers in the
Arab-Israel war. Their silence demonstrates that they have no interest in
morality. That is to say, their silence proves they are neither fair, balanced
nor truthful. Their silence does not support their advertised concern for peace.
Rather, it supports the Arab against Israel--because that silence helps to validate
the lie that Israel is a criminal nation—or a nation bordering on criminality.
In fact, it
the Arab who should get this label, not Israel. The Arab, not Israel, commits these
crimes. If the EU and the UN were truly honest brokers, they would call a spade
a spade—and denounce the war crimes committed by the Arab.
To
understand the war crimes committed in this kidnapping, here is a brief review
of ‘War Crimes’, ‘Crimes against Humanity’ and ‘Genocide’. The definitions come
directly from The Rome Statutes of the International Criminal Court.
The Rome
Statutes of the International Criminal Court were established in order to strengthen
and to reaffirm the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United
Nations (The Rome Statutes, July 2002, Preamble). Most specifically, the
Statutes aim to make certain that no state will use force against the
territorial integrity or political independence of any other state (ibid)—and
be able to get away with it.
The Statutes’ purpose is to create an
effective means to prosecute both crimes and atrocities that threaten world peace
and security (ibid). The Statutes begin by defining ‘Genocide’. Article 6 of
the Statutes defines ‘Genocide’ as including (among other things), causing
serious bodily or mental harm to members of a group; and forcibly transferring
children of one group to another group.
Article 7
defines ‘Crimes against Humanity’ as “acts committed as part of a widespread or
systematic attack directed against any civilian population. Examples of such
acts include:
- Imprisonment or other severe
deprivation of physical liberty; and, the “Enforced disappearance of persons
[i.e., kidnapping]”.
Article 8
defines ‘War crimes‘ to include attacks directed against any civilian
population, including a course of conduct involving ‘the multiple commission of
acts’ against a civilian population; taking hostages; and intentionally
directing attacks against individual
civilians not taking direct part in hostilities.
There’s
more, but you get the point: kidnapping civilians is a war crime. It is a crime against humanity (Article
7, above). Forcibly tranferring Jewish children from Jewish to Arab hands (that’s
what this kidnapping involved) is another war crime called genocide (Article 6).
Severely depriving these three children of their liberty is another war crime. It
is a crime against humanity (Article 7). Intentionally directing an attack upon
these three civilians—who take no direct part in Arab-Israel hostilities—is
another war crime (Article 8). Causing these three Jews serious bodily or
mental harm because they are members of a ‘group’ is a war crime called
genocide (Article 6).
Over the
last year, Arabs from Hamas and Fatah areas—with Hamas and Fatah blessing—have committed
multiple acts of aggression against Israel’s civilian population (a war crime
under Article 8). Arabs have attempted no less than 23 kidnappings against Jews
in Israel. These attacks constitute ‘crimes against humanity’ because they
represented ‘a widespread or systematic attack directed against [Israel’s]
civilian population‘(Article 7).
This is not
rocket science. You don’t have to be a legal Einstein to figure this out. A
simple google search will do.
Nevertheless,
the EU and the UN have swept all of this ‘under the rug’. They have yet to
accuse the Arab of anything. But they are quick to warn Israel that it might
be committing war crimes.
That’s not
right. It reveals that the EU and the UN are not objective ‘peace-makers’. Clearly,
they have cast objectivity aside to choose sides.
The UN and
EU are not moral arbiters. They are hypocrites. Under the guise of ‘peace’,
they support the Arab war against Israel.
They are
enemies of truth. They are the enemies of Israel.
No comments:
Post a Comment