On Friday,
November 13, 2015, Islamic Jihad came to France. The Islamic State (ISIS)
attacked Paris, killing at least 129 people. It was a horrific assault against
the West.
As a
consequence, French President Francois Hollande decaled war against ISIS (Peter
Henn, “Francois Hollande declares France is now at WAR with ISIS with second
night of bombings”, Daily Express, November 17, 2015). Hollande said, "France is at war. These
attacks were war. It was an attack against our values, against our youth and
our way of life” (ibid).
So how will
France—and the rest of the EU—fight this war? It will fight very, very badly.
First,
France will fight by bombing ISIS positions in Syria (ibid). That’s a problem. You
see, ISIS is de-centralized (Sam Johnson, “Opaque structure adds to challenge
of defeating Isis”, ft.com, August 24, 2014). It’s extremely questionable
how bombing ISIS in Syria will combat ISIS in France. Chances are, it
won’t.
Second,
France wants to join hands with Iran (Natasha Bertrand, “BREMMER: The Paris
attacks put Russia and Iran ‘in a stronger position'”, Business Insider,
November 17, 2015). Specifically, French President Hollande wants to form a
coalition that includes Russia, the US and Iran (ibid). Hollande has already argued
that, if the world wants to control Assad, it’s going to have to accept Iran as
a regional powerbroker (ibid)—because Iran backs Assad (“Iran spending billions
to back Assad”, Jerusalem Post, June 11, 2015). Without Iran, Assad can
lose to ISIS.
Hollande believes
that helping Iran save Assad in order to fight ISIS will bring peace with Islam.
But Iran is considered to be the world’s
greatest sponsor of Islamic terror (Amy Zalman, “Iran and Terrorism - State Sponsored
Terrorism in Iran” terrorism. about, no date). Senator Lindsey Graham of
the US has said that Iran is far worse than ISIS (Corey Bennet, “Graham:
Iranian regime worse than ISIS”, the hill, March 8, 2015). Iran has more
money than ISIS. It’s a far greater threat than ISIS.
Why would
the West want to fight ISIS by forming a working partnership with the world’s
greatest Islamic terror regime? That would be like trying to eradicate heart disease
by spreading cancer.
France is
clueless. Unfortunately, it isn’t alone.
For example,
Sweden and Spain have their own ideas about how to fight terror. What they’ve
done tells you how completely clueless they are about Jihadi hatred for
Western values, culture and society.
After the
November 13th ISIS attack in France, Sweden’s Foreign Minister
Margot Wallstrom announced that she knew who was responsible for this attack.
She also suggested how to stop Islamic terror (Nitsan Keidar, “Outrage after
Swedish foreign minister links ISIS attack, Israel”, Arutz Sheva,
November 16, 2015).
She blamed
Israel for the attack. She suggested that if the world forced Israel to
surrender to ‘Palestinian’ demands, Islamic terror would stop.
She ignored
the fact that the ISIS attack had nothing to do with Israel. It was about what ISIS called the prostitution, vice and Christianity of the West (“Sweden: anti-Semitic libel?
You decide”, tuviabrodieblog, November 16, 2015).
After Sweden,
Spain stepped into the spotlight. Spain looked at the headlines about Islamic
Jihad, did a brief calculation--and issued an arrest warrant.
Well, it
wasn’t exactly Spain that issued the arrest warrant. It was a Spanish
judge. We should note that distinction.
Was it coincidence
that this particular arrest warrant was issued at this specific time? I don’t
believe it was a coincidence. I think it was deliberate. I think it was done to
‘make a statement’—to show Muslims in Europe whose side Spain was on.
Whose name
was on the arrest warrant? It wasn’t a Jihadist name. It wasn’t a French or
Spanish name. it wasn’t even a Muslim name.
It was a
Jewish name: Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
There is
something called, ‘universal jurisdiction’. It’s a legal term. It allows a national
court to try cases of the gravest crimes against humanity [emphasis
mine], even if these crimes are not committed in the territory where that court
is located--and even if those gravest of crimes against humanity are committed
by government leaders of other states (“universal jurisdiction”, Global
Policy Forum, no date). The principle behind this concept is that “such
crimes harm the international community or international order itself, which
individual States may act to protect (“universal jurisdiction”, International
Justice Resource Center, no date).
This Spanish
judge, acting on behalf of Spain, wants to protect the international community.
He wants to arrest Israel’s Prime Minister—along with several other current and
former politicians and officials—for war crimes against humanity.
Will Islamic
terror stay away from Spain because of this warrant? Well, what has arresting
Benjamin Netanyahu got to do with Europe’s ‘prostitution, vice and Christianity’?
Nothing.
In a world
that needs protection from Islamic terror, this judge will bring that protection
by criminalizing Jews who defend themselves against Islamic terror?
Apparently, this
is how Europe thinks: it sees it’s being overrun by Muslim migrants who leave human
feces everywhere (“An Orgy of Garbage & Feces of Unparalleled Proportions
is Left Behind by Migrants”, rightwing news, October 18, 2015); it sees it’s
got thousands of unidentifiable Jihadists embedded with migrants who’ve already
spread out across the European landscape
(“Obama’s Dead Wrong About the Paris Attacks”, counterjihadreport,
November 14, 2015); it sees it’s lost control over its borders (Tom Batchelor, “We're
doomed: EU chief fears union will COLLAPSE over migrant crisis”, Daily Express,
September 24, 2015): therefore, it will act aggressively to protect itself.
It’ll bomb
Syria. It’ll issue an arrest warrant for Israel’s Prime Minister.
It’ll create
solutions that have nothing to do with the problem. It’ll create, in other
words, a recipe for disaster.
If this is
how Europe fights Islamic terror, it’s doomed. If you’re Jewish and live in
Europe, make aliyah now. Come to Israel. You’ll be a lot safer. Israel knows
how to fight these killers.
No comments:
Post a Comment