US President
Barack Obama can’t boast enough over his new deal with Iran. Actually, his boasting
began before the deal. In early March, 2015, he made the claim, “What I can
guarantee is that if it’s a deal I’ve signed off on, I will be able to prove
that it is the best way for us to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon”
(Charlie Spierling, “Obama reacts to Netanyahu Speech ‘As Far As I Could Tell,
There Was Nothing New’”, Breitbart, March 3, 2015).
Now, after
the deal, he admits that his ‘historic’ deal allows the wait-time for Iran to
develop a nuclear weapon to drop to ‘zero’ (“Obama: Iran Nuclear 'Breakout
Time' Would Drop”, Voice of America, April 7, 2015). That means that his
deal will not stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons.
Nevertheless,
he argues that this deal is “a “once in a lifetime opportunity”. It will, he
promises, curb the spread of nuclear weapons in the Middle East (Peter Baker, “President
Obama Calls Preliminary Iran Nuclear Deal ‘Our Best Bet’”, New York Times,
April 5, 2015).
Many, many
Americans don’t believe him. For one thing, US Republicans don’t believe him
(Daniel DePetris, “Republican Hopefuls for 2016 Hate the Iran Deal”, Huffington
Post, April 6, 2015). Yes, this particular response could be called
expected—and political. But Republicans control the Congress. Congress could
play a spoiler role in negotiations that won’t end much before the final
deadline, June 30, 2015.
What
Republicans think is important. Right now, they don’t like what they see.
Two former
US Secretaries of State, Henry Kissinger and George Schultz, have blasted the
deal (Patrick Brennan, “Henry Kissinger and George Shultz Both Oppose the Iran
Deal”, The National Review, April 7, 2015). These two former officials “don’t
absolutely hate the deal, but they have problems with almost every aspect of
its design and implementation — and with President Obama’s underlying theory
about Iran, that engaging it as a partner in the Middle East can go a long way
toward pacifying the region and reducing American involvement there. The
secretaries definitely don’t see that happening” (ibid).
Former Vice
President Dick Cheney doesn’t believe him (Amy Miller, “Cheney says what we’re
all thinking about Obama’s foreign policy”, Legal Insurrection, April 8,
2015). In fact, Cheney is appalled. He’s just been quoted as saying about this
deal, “if you had somebody as president who wanted to take America down, who
wanted to fundamentally weaken our position in the world and reduce our
capacity to influence events, turn our back on our allies and encourage our
adversaries, it would look exactly like what Barack Obama’s doing” (ibid).
The American
public doesn’t like how this deal was done (Meteor Blades, “Reuters/Ipsos poll
shows deep divide among Americans over deal with Iran”, dailykos, April
8, 2015). According to Reuters, only 30 per cent of Americans approve of
Obama’s negotiations with Iran (ibid). Americans are definitely unsure what
Obama should do (ibid). But they don’t like what he’s done so far.
Perhaps
Daniel Greenfield said it best (“Obama’s Admission that Deal Will Give Iran a
Zero Breakout Time Should be a Gamechanger”, Front Page Mag, April 8,
2015): “This [admission] is the closest that Obama has come to admitting that
his deal is a dead end. Even if it works as he has billed it, it passes the
buck while promising that the time for action will always exist… unless there’s
a miscalculation, in which case, Boom.”
The White
House, meanwhile, won’t give up going after Israel Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu. Netanyahu gave a speech to Congress in March 2015 where he claimed
that the deal Obama had been working on won’t end Iran’s road to a bomb; it
would pave that road to a bomb. Now, a deal (kind of) in hand (nothing’s been
put into writing), the White House has been accused of mocking Netanyahu for
arguing against the deal (Bridget Johnson, “White House Mocks Netanyahu’s Bomb
Drawing in Iran Graphic”, pjmedia, April 8, 2015).
Here’s the
bottom line for the Iran deal: US and Iran sign nothing, US and Iran both claim
‘victory’, White House mocks the Jew.
How’s that
going to work out?
No comments:
Post a Comment