Even before
the 2014 Gaza-Israel war ended, it seems that everyone decided that Hamas
didn’t have the money or the materials it’d need to rebuild Gaza, parts of which had been devastated by that war. At that time
(early August, 2014), it was also decided, apparently, that Hamas wouldn’t be
the ones to do the rebuilding (Erin Banco, “Ruined Gaza Will Not Be Rebuilt By
Hamas”, International Business Times, August 7, 2014).
Before the
war had ended, conventional wisdom proposed that any reconstruction of Gaza would
most likely be left up to humanitarian and other aid organizations on the
ground (ibid). It was further decided that Hamas wouldn’t be held responsible
for paying for any reconstruction costs (ibid). The costs would be covered by
the ‘international community’ (ibid).
Hamas was
very lucky. It had started a war. As a result of that very bad decision, part
of its Gaza had been pummelled into the Stone Age. Yet it would carry no
responsibility for the damage it had brought upon itself.
By October
2014, seven weeks after the war, the international community appeared ready to come
to Hamas’ aid. Representatives from “dozens”
of countries gathered in Cairo (Bill Chappell, “U.S. And Other Nations Pledge
$5.4 Billion To Rebuild Gaza”, npr, October 12, 2014). It took them less
than a day to decide what to do.
They’d give
Hamas billions. News outlets around the world reported the story: these donors pledged
$5.4 billion for reconstruction.
Fifteen
weeks later—near the end of January, 2015—the United Nations Relief and Works
Agency (UNRWA) reported that “virtually none” of the pledged donations had
reached Gaza (“UN out of money to rebuild Gaza after donors fail to pay”,
National World, January 27, 2015). What
had happened?
Nobody said.
Nobody asked anyone what went wrong—or, if they did ask, they didn’t report the
answer.
A month after
that, UNRWA officials got angry. They accused the ‘world’ of forfeiting on
their pledges (Chris Gunness, “The world has broken its promises about rebuilding
Gaza – and the children will suffer”, unrwa website, February 24, 2015).
Had all
those donors lied to Hamas? Were their $5.4 billion pledges a cruel hoax?
Nobody was
saying. Nobody attempted to answer the question.
Two weeks
ago, the Gaza story took cruel another turn. We learned that Gaza had apparently
become the victim of ‘creative accounting’ (“International donors fail to
deliver promised aid to Gaza”, Jerusalem Post, April 13, 2015).
You know
about ‘creative accounting’, right? It’s a form of lying. It’s a way to
deceive.
Here’s the
deception: originally, those wonderfully generous international donors pledged
$5.4 billion, as you saw above. At that time (October, 2014), that was a big
deal. That much money always is.
But it now turns
out that the $5.4 billion never existed. It was a fake number. The amount
pledged had only been $3.5 billion (Jerusalem Post, ibid).
Where did
the other $1.9 billion go? Nobody said.
Did donors
back out? Nobody said.
Had some
donors lied about their pledges? Nobody said. Nobody inquired—or if they had,
they weren’t talking about it.
It didn’t
really matter. The Gaza reconstruction fund didn’t reach $950 million. Who cared
if the original pledges were ‘only’ $3.5 billion?
Now, near
the end of April, 2015, we see the consequences of all the lying, deception and
creative accounting. Last week, UNRWA reported that, as of April 20, 2015, it
has received only enough funds to rebuild 200 of some 9,161 homes destroyed during
the 2014 Gaza war (“Gaza Emergency Situation Report”, unrwa usa, April
14-21, 2015). More significant, however, was the fact that it really doesn’t
matter how much—or how little—Gaza has received for rebuilding: since the war
ended eight months ago, “not a single totally destroyed home has been rebuilt
in Gaza” (ibid)--not one.
Truly, Gaza
has been abandoned. It’s been betrayed.
No one reports
on this. Apparently, no one cares.
Perhaps the
G-d of Israel is teaching us a moral lesson here. Perhaps He’s teaching us about
what happens when you attack His Chosen, His Treasure--His nation of Israel.
No comments:
Post a Comment