In 1890, Zionism
meant only one thing: returning to land from which we had been expelled by
non-Jews. Zionism had nothing to do with social justice, democracy or equality.
It was about
Jews. It was about Israel. It was about ‘return’.
To borrow a
modern phrase, its focus was ‘a Jewish settlement enterprise’. It dreamed to
return to and resettle our Jewish-national-ancestral-Biblical homeland.
In 1890,
there was no formal Zionist Party. There was no formal religious Zionist
Party. There were only ‘Zionists’.
That’s no
longer true. Today, there are all kinds of Zionists. Today, even anti-Zionists
call themselves Zionists.
If we’re not
careful, anti-Zionists could win the upcoming elections--in the name of ‘Zionism’.
Look at the anti-Zionist Labor-Hatnua unity Party. It calls itself ‘The Zionist
Camp’. It leads the supposedly (on paper) Zionist Likud in pre-election polls
(“Poll: Labor Still Strong as Jewish Home Weakens”, Arutz Sheva, January
27, 2015).
If we’re not
careful, these anti-Zionists could un-Zion us. If they win, they could end the
‘settlement enterprise’. They could take Jewish ancestral-Biblical homeland
away from us. They could destroy Jewish
Israel.
Look at
Likud. Likud is Israel’s largest, most powerful political party—at least as of
January 2015. Likud is Israel’s largest Zionist Party. We know it’s ‘Zionist’ because—somewhere
on its Homepage—it asserts that its goal is “to strengthen and promote the
values of Zionism in Israel”.
But then, look
at party head (and current Prime Minister) Benjamin Netanyahu. He says he
promotes the ‘settlement enterprise’. But he maintains a de facto settlement
freeze. He says he believes in Israel. But he negotiates to give away ancestral
Judea-Samaria.
Likud
abandons the Zionist dream.
Israel’s
Dati Leumi (Religious Zionist) parties also have a problem. Religious Zionists
believe that Zionism has a Divine origin. They link G-d to Israel.
After all,
we didn’t return to Israel because the UN needed a place to send displaced Jews
after the Holocaust—and chose Israel for us to go to. We returned because of G-d,
Torah and heritage.
Nevertheless,
Religious Zionists don’t talk about G-d in public. They abandon G-d.
Some say
that Naftali Bennet, leader of the Jewish Home Party is, by virtue of the seats
he controls in Israel’s Knesset, Israel’s most prominent Religious Zionist
leader. How many times has he spoken of G-d and Israel in public? How many of his decisions, public statements
and votes support a universally-accepted definition of religious Zionism?
Zionism—both
secular and religious—drifts. It has no definition. It no longer inspires us.
We had
better re-kindle that inspiration because if we don’t, the Left will do it for
us. It will appropriate what is naturally ours and use it to take the leadership
of Israel away from us.
In fact, the
Left has already begun to do just that. If ‘Zionists’ have walked away from
Zionism, the Left has taken over the empty shell.
The Left redefines
‘Zionism’ as the Leftist message (Yair Rosenberg, “Watch the Knesset
Speech That Shows How Israel’s Left Can Win”, The Tablet Magazine,
January 26, 2015). It undercuts the Zionist enterprise. It rejects any Divine
link to Zion. It takes our hollowed-out Zionism and dumps ‘democracy and social
justice’ into the hollow (“Labor-Hatnua defends its Zionist cred from Likud,
Bayit Yehudi attacks”, Jerusalem Post, January 22, 2015).
Right now, only
the Left talks about Zionism. Only the Left uses Zionism to inspire. It may
have even found its ‘Zionist’ stump-speech’ to inspire voter attention (Tablet,
ibid). It’s a speech some feel could break the political Right (ibid).
It’s a very
simple speech. It redefines ‘Zionism’.
For this
speech, ‘Zionism’ has nothing to do with settling Israel. It has nothing to do
with making a Jewish Israel strong. It has nothing to do with maintaining the
integrity of the Jewish national homeland. It has nothing to do with G-d or the
Divine Promises of the 3,300+ year-old Tanach.
For this
Leftist speech, ‘Zionism’ is all about social justice for Israelis, wealth
redistribution and stamping out the corruption of the political Right (ibid).
As articulated in a brief, 3-minute speech in the Knesset last week by Leftist
Labor MK Sava Shaffir, this new ‘Zionism’ is the “true Zionism”.
“True
Zionism”, Shaffir said, means “to distribute the budget equally among all
citizens. “True Zionism” is to be concerned for the weak. “True Zionism” is about
fixing relationships between people. It’s about peace. It’s about equal rights
and equal portions for all Israelis (ibid).
This
so-called “true Zionism” is, in other words, the Leftist agenda repackaged for your
vote. It redefines ‘Zionism’ to its own agenda.
Secular and
Religious Zionists are going to have to talk about Zionism. They’re going to
have to explain that Zionism is about Jews. It’s about homeland. It’s about
G-d. It’s about settling ancient Jewish Biblical land. It’s about protecting
Israel’s Jewish character. If the real Zionists of Israel fail to do that,
Israel’s voters could elect a Leftist “Zionism” that will destroy Jewish
Israel.
For this
election, Israel has the chance to re-ignite the Zionist dream as the way we
prepare the land for Redemption. But Israel also has the chance in this
election to redefine Zionism—and thereby destroy Jewish Israel.
What will
you vote for?
No comments:
Post a Comment