Joan Peters
is dead. She left this world on Tuesday, January 5/6, 2015, age 76.
We cannot
mourn her enough.
In 1984, Joan
Peters published a book called, From Time Immemorial. That book was about
the Arab-Israel conflict.
That book,
for the anti-Israel Left, was a horror story.
You see, the
book didn’t fit the narrative that Leftist historians had begun to build about
the Arab-Israel conflict. It didn’t
demonize Israel. It didn’t ennoble the Arab refuge. It didn’t conform to the
Arab narrative.
Instead, it
committed a horrible academic crime: it said that Arab leadership, cynicism and
Jew-hate were responsible for the Arab refuge problem. It said that, although
some Israelis had committed some crimes, the Arab refugee problem hadn’t been
caused by Israel. It said that the Arab problem certainly hadn’t been caused by
Israeli cruelty or selfishness, as the Arab narrative claimed. The Arabs themselves
had created the problem, not the Jews.
When her
book was published, academic reviewers attacked it—and her. The reviews were
vicious. They claimed she didn’t do proper research. She cherry-picked facts.
She didn’t search out Arab source material. She presented only the Israeli
side.
They said
she distorted fact. She misrepresented truth. She didn’t tell the ‘real’ story.
In the
opinion of some, those reviewers were hypocrites. They accused her of
committing for Jews all of the academic malpractice that they had themselves
committed on behalf of the Arab narrative. She had turned the tables on them.
She had used their own techniques to do for Jews what they had done for the
Arab.
How dare she
do that? How dare she defend the demon Israel? How dare she insult them that
way?
She wasn’t
even an historian.
She was a
journalist.
She’d been struck
by the plight of Arab refugees. She felt their pain. She wanted to write about
their humanitarian suffering. She felt
that ‘the deprivation of Arab refugees’ human rights, and the political
manipulation of their unfortunate situation’ appeared ‘to be unconscionable’ to
her (From Time Immemorial, JKAP Publications, USA, 1984, p.3).
At first, she
saw these displaced Arabs as an appealing, victimized people who remained
displaced--with too few options to correct their ‘civil wound’ (ibid, p. 4). She
wanted to tell their story.
She started
researching. As a journalist, she understood how to do that. What she found at
first surprised her. Then it disturbed her.
For example,
she discovered that, since around 1948 (the year modern Israel was born),
‘whole Jewish populations from numerous Arab countries had been forced to flee
as refugees’ (ibid, p.4). She discovered that no one had been interested in these
Jewish refugees. They had been interested only in the Arab refugees.
The number
of both refugee groups—Arab and Jew—was, she discovered, about the same. But then,
she also discovered that the population count for the Arab refugees had been,
she suggested, inflated.
She
discovered that the term, ‘refugee’ had been redefined. But that redefinition
was applied only to the Arab refugee—and to no one else. She discovered that
only these Arabs were allowed to remain with a uniquely ‘permanent’ refugee status.
Jewish
refugees reintegrated into other countries, including Israel. The Arab refugees
remained trapped in squalid, permanent ‘camps’.
She wanted
to know, why was it necessary to amend the definition of ‘refugee’ for the
Arabs? She wanted to know, why are these
Arabs so often described as ‘victims of Israel’s existence?’ (ibid, p.6). Why
did they alone remain ‘permanent’ refugees?
Why didn’t
they reintegrate into nearby Arab countries?
For Joan
Peters, what began as a look at the plight of Arab refugees led to a concentrated
reflection upon the lengths to which Arabs were willing to go in order to
express their hostility towards a Jewish state (ibid, p. 7). That hostility,
she discovered, was responsible for many wrongs, including a deliberate and “cruel
indifference to the well-being of their own brethren” (ibid).
You know
what her problem was? She wasn’t an academician. She wasn’t a historian. She wasn’t a Leftist duped (or self-duped)
into supporting a fiction about the origins and nature of the Arab-Israel war.
She was just a journalist trying to find answers.
She offended
the real historians and academicians. She wasn’t a professional, as they were. She didn’t
stick to the accepted sources, as they did. To them, she was nothing more than
a damn shill for the damn Jews who ran the damn Israel.
If you read
these reviews, you could easily conclude that she was a stupid, demented woman--a
propagandist for the evil Israel. But she was none of these things. She was a Jewish hero.
She revealed the truth about the ‘Arab
narrative’. Her sin was, she wrote about that truth. She had the unmitigated
gall to tell that truth.
Now, more
than thirty years later, almost all of what she wrote has proven true. What she
wrote in 1984 still rings true. When you read this book, she wrote, “the events
in today’s [1984] headlines can be understood and evaluated” properly when you
understand the anti-Israel context in which they occur (ibid, p.9). That is as
true in 2015 as it was thirty-one years ago.
Her book has
withstood the test of time.
Joan Peters, you return to your Creator. You
have served Him well. May HaShem, the Creator of the Universe, comfort you for
the hate heaped upon you. May HaShem, Creator of the Universe, comfort your
husband and your family among the mourners of Zion and Jerusalem.
No comments:
Post a Comment