In America, Jews
are a minority. They’re not Christian. They’re
often pro-Israel. How does that sit with America’s mainstream media (msm)?
That’s a
tough question. One reason it’s so difficult to answer is the nature of today’s
media.
Modern media
is no longer a reliable news source. It doesn’t tell the truth. It’s become a
propaganda machine.
It doesn’t digest
the news for your benefit. It cooks the news, the better to manipulate you.
It shapes
the news. It manages the news according to the point of view it believes readers
want to—or should--see.
As in war,
the first casualty in such a ‘news process’ is truth. Objective news isn’t a goal—that
won’t shape how readers think. What’s
important today is the ‘narrative’ you see; when a provider can shape the news
to that ‘narrative’, it has the power to create a readership that loves every
(predictable) word it writes.
If the
provider can make the news riveting—with a bad guy you can boo—prospects for
success jump: readers love a good story.
That’s how America’s
msm uses Israel and the Jews—to shape a story. Israel and the Jews don’t
exist to tell the world the truth about Muslim Jew-hate. It uses Israel and the
Jews to sell a predictable ‘narrative’ about bad versus good, Israel versus
Arab.
The
narrative is almost always the same. Israel is the bad guy, always harming
others; Jews are a threat, always, in some way, manipulative, controlling
others.
We saw this narrative—and
its ugly consequence--at work at a CNN Republican Presidential candidate debate
on Wednesday night, September 16, 2015. According to the ratings, the debate
was a ‘smash hit’ (Matt Wilstein, “CNN Debate Gives Network Its Highest Ratings
Ever”, mediaite. com, September 17, 2015).
As millions
watched (ibid), several candidates referred to Israel in positive terms. These
repeated references offended one of America’s ‘star pundits’, Conservative Ann
Coulter. While Republican candidates reaffirmed their support for Israel in
their closing statements, Coulter tweeted, “how many f—king Jews do these
people think there are in the United States?” (Karol Markowicz, “How Ann
Coulter Made It Kosher To Hate Jews”, forward, September 17, 2015). Her comment
supposedly caused an uproar. It didn’t.
Instead, it brought
out pro-Coulter defenders, many of them echoing two ideas: (1)“Lots of people agree with her. She should
stand tough and not grovel before the kikes. Kikes don't care what you call
them as long as they're making money. The more the kikes bitch, the more people
turn against them” (“Ann Coulter has her Mel Gibson moment,” vnnforum,
September 17, 2015); and, (2) “Coulter has a strong enough following to do a
Glenn Beck and start her own media empire” (ibid).
The next day
(Thursday, September 17, 2015), Coulter assessed the supposed uproar she’d
caused. She tweeted, “Boy were they wrong @ Jewish influence! I complained
about pandering on Israel (Reagan & abortion) & haven’t heard a thing
about it!” (Markowicz, ibid).
Coulter says
she likes Jews—and Israel (ibid). But her comment about ‘f—king Jews’ didn’t suggest
that. It suggested what her many defenders revealed: Jew-hate, Israel-bashing
and Holocaust-denial.
It was ugly.
She’d used her position as a public professional to open an extremely dangerous
door (virulent anti-Semitism).
Her comment hardly
caused a blip on the news. USA Today said her comment received (only) ‘mixed
results’ (Mary Bowerman, “Ann Coulter rants about 'Jews' and Israel during GOP
debate”, September 17, 2015). A search on the New York Times site came
up blank. Ditto for the Washington Post.
Coulter used
gutter language to vilify Jews. No one cared. But when Donald Trump didn’t
verbally attack a questioner at a campaign stop the day after the CNN debate, msm
went nuts. Trump’s non-attack against a man who called US President
Barack Obama a Muslim was termed ‘racist’ (Josh Feldman, “DNC Pounces on Trump
Muslim Question Uproar: His 'Racism Knows No Bounds'”, mediaite,
September 17, 2015). He was called ‘gutless (Josh Feldman, “Anderson Cooper
Trashes Trump: Didn't Have 'Guts' to Rebuke Anti-Muslim 'Loudmouth'”, mediate,
September 17, 2015).
In the
firestorm that followed his non-response to the Muslim reference, Trump was
thoroughly raked over the coals (Josh Feldman, “Matthews Rips Trump's 'Racist
Crap' After Rally Question About Getting Rid of Muslims”, mediaite,
September 17, 2015). But, you may notice, when Ann Coulter referred to Jews as
‘f—king Jews’, no one in the media rushed to accuse her of anything.
American
Jews, beware. Muslims are protected. They’re off limits. But you’ve just been
re-classified. You’re no longer ‘Jews’. You’re now, ‘f—king Jews’.
If you’ve
ever been assaulted on the street by a Jew-hating thug, you understand clearly
what those two words really, really mean.
Are you
listening?
Here’s some
advice: pick up, pack up and come home. Israel wants you. Increasingly now, America
doesn’t.
I was appalled by Ms. Coulter's inexcusable and disgusting "tweets". .
ReplyDeleteShe obviously fails to understand the biblical mandate given by Almighty God concerning His chosen nation and people: "I will bless thee who bless you and curse them that curse or use insolent language against you." Genesis 12:3
There are many Christian Americans who do believe this and whom are standing with the nation and the people of Israel in these dark and perilous times. I am one of them!