Here’s an
essay that may require a strong stomach to read. It’s “Obama’s Genocidal
Treason”, frontpagemag, September 24, 2015, by essayist Daniel
Greenfield. I’ve edited it.
I want you
to tell me what you think of it:
“No
government has the blood of more American soldiers on its hands today than the
government of Iran. From Lebanon to Afghanistan to Saudi Arabia to Iraq, Iran
has been killing American soldiers for decades.
241 in
Beirut. 19 at the Khobar Towers. Over 500 in Iraq and Afghanistan. The last
time the United States officially fought Iran was under Reagan. But Iran has
never stopped killing Americans. There’s no reason to believe that this killing
will stop once Iran has the nuclear weapons that Obama is helping it obtain.
The last
time left-wing radicals helped an open enemy of the United States go nuclear,
they were put on trial. The sentencing judge at the time said that because “the
nature of Russian terrorism is now self-evident” it was now impossible to claim
no harm had been done.
“I believe
your conduct in putting into the hands of the Russians the A-bomb years before
our best scientists predicted Russia would perfect the bomb has already caused,
in my opinion, the Communist aggression in Korea, with the resultant casualties
exceeding 50,000 and who knows but that millions more of innocent people may
pay the price of your treason. Indeed, by your betrayal you undoubtedly have
altered the course of history to the disadvantage of our country,” Judge
Kaufman stated.
These words
of the Rosenberg verdict apply equally well to Obama’s betrayal on Iran. What
the Rosenbergs did for Stalin, Obama does for the Ayatollah Khamenei.
Obama’s
dirty nuclear deal with Iran has already empowered Iran’s aggression across the
region. The more concessions Obama, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry have made,
the more aggressive Iran has become.
If Iran is
allowed to go nuclear, its aggression will become much worse and much more
devastating.
This isn’t a
Chamberlain story. It’s Vidkun Quisling and Philippe Pétain.
It’s not bad
judgment. It’s treason.
Obama doesn't appease Iran; he sympathizes with its anti-American grievances. As he told
his negotiators, Iran’s rulers feel “vulnerable” because of how America
“meddled” in “their democracy” and that its anti-Americanism is a “defensive”
reaction to “avoid repeats of the past.”
Obama
identifies with the anti-American resentments of Muslim terrorists instead of
the suffering of their victims. His foreign policy has been based on empowering
the enemies of the United States to turn their grievances into a “defense”
against American influence and intervention. He has done it from Cuba to Iran,
backing Communist and Muslim Brotherhood tyrants. But his Iranian deal is his
bloodiest crime.
An Iranian nuclear
bomb isn’t just a weapon. It’s an instrument of genocide. It’s an existential
threat to our civilization. The spies who helped the USSR go nuclear weren’t
just passing along information about a weapon; they transformed a military
conflict into a permanent global crisis in which the very fate of humanity
rested on the whims of brutal aging ideologues in Moscow.
By clearing
Iran’s path to the bomb, Obama has transformed the slow conflicts of
conventional terrorism into a catastrophic civilizational crisis. An Iranian
nuclear bomb will not sneak up on us the way that the demographic crisis of
Muslim migration and its accompanying terrorism have. It will not be an
incremental problem. A nuclear arms race between Sunnis and Shiites in which
terrorists on both sides wield nuclear weapons will make the entire structure
of Western civilization unsustainable.
9/11 saw a
few jets used to devastate a city. The next wave of weapons will kill millions,
not thousands.
The traitors
who turned the USSR into a power capable of destroying the world were motivated
by the same hidden agenda as the proponents of the Iran nuclear deal. They
believed that an American nuclear monopoly would lead to arrogance and
warmongering. They were convinced that American power had to be checked.
Those who
have opened the nuclear gates to Tehran today believe that a nuclear Iran will
be a deterrent against American imperialism. Their number includes Barack
Obama.
After having
failed with the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama intends to make Iranian power into a
deterrent against future military interventions by a Republican successor. If
he can get “Tehran Joe” Biden, a notorious sympathizer of the Iran Lobby, to
watch the store while Iran goes nuclear, Iran will dominate the region the way
that the Soviet Union dominated Eastern Europe.
Obama’s
terrorist treason gambles that Iran will be “rational”. He gambles that Iran’s leaders
will be Khrushchevs, political and cautious, rather than Stalins, willing to
kill millions for a murderous ideology.
Leftist
appeasers of Iran, in and out of the administration, obsessively cling to the
belief that the Islamic regime in Iran is rational. They rationalize their
treason by insisting that Iran’s leaders and fevered mobs don’t really mean it
when they shriek, “Death to America”.
If Iran’s
leader did mean it, Obama and his friends could be accessories to genocide.
Obama’s Iran
pathway has rationalized treason at every step, made every compromise seem
inevitable and reasonable, and minimized the final catastrophic betrayal by
presenting his version of a nuclear Iran as the only possible choice. Like
Benedict Arnold, he whittled away all other options except defeat or treason so
as to make the latter seem like the sensible and patriotic choice.
Stalin’s
nuclear traitors used the same logic. By
rationalizing each betrayal as the only alternative to war, they forced us to raise
our children under a shadow of nuclear annihilation.
Obama has done
the same thing. He’s betrayed America. He’s betrayed the American victims of
Iranian terror. He’s betrayed American soldiers who were murdered, maimed and
tortured by Iran’s terrorist armies. He’s betrayed hundreds of millions of
Americans in the homeland who will now be forced to raise their children under
the shadow of Iran’s nuclear terror.
For the
first time since the end of the Cold War, Obama makes the mass murder of
millions of Americans by a vicious enemy possible once again.
This US
president has impoverished millions of Americans. He has the blood of soldiers
and police officers on his hands. But his final legacy may be far worse—a collaboration
in acts of mass murder that would rival Adolf Hitler”.
These are
very, very strong words. Is this essayist correct?
Has Barack Obama committed treason? Does such treason open the
door to genocide against America?
You'll have to decide for yourself.
No comments:
Post a Comment