Let’s begin
to answer this question with two definitions. First, let’s define ‘supporter’.
A
‘supporter’ is a ‘backer’. A ‘backer’ is a benefactor. A benefactor provides
financial backing to a recipient.
The second
definition is for anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism is the hatred of the Jewish
people (Martin Luther King Jr, “Letter to an Anti-Zionist Friend”, Saturday
Review, XLVII, August, 1967, p. 76). It’s a blot on the soul of mankind
(ibid). It’s related to anti-Zionism.
“When people criticize Zionism, they mean Jews…Anti-Zionism is inherently
anti-Semitic” (ibid).
Now, let’s
merge these definitions. If someone is going to give financial backing to anti-Semitism
disguised as anti-Zionism, what’s the most efficient way to do that? There are two
main ways.
The first,
less efficient way, is to research who in the world is anti-Semitic, who is anti-Zionist.
Merge the two lists. Write checks every year to each name on the list.
That’s
cumbersome. It takes time. It requires effort.
The second
way is more efficient. It requires only one check a year.
This second way
also requires no research, no list-management or multiple check-writing. It
makes supporting anti-Semitism simple, easy and convenient.
All a
supporter has to do is find an organization capable of using that support to
mount an ever-increasing attack against Jews and/or the Jewish state. Does such
an organization exist?
It certainly
does. It’s called, the United Nations.
The UN is a
brand name. It’s got world-class name-recognition. It’s got a
‘cover-story’. It’s the world’s leading Humanitarian organization.
Is the UN up
to the challenge? Will it promote anti-Semitism/anti-Zionism? Does it have the
infrastructure to do that?
The answer
is, yes on all counts. The UN is loaded with anti-Zionists.
Its General
Assembly is crowded with them. They regularly approve condemnations of Israel.
Its United
Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) is so ready to promote anti-Semitism as anti-Zionism
it even has a special rule just for Israel: Israel must be placed on every
UNHRC agenda. That means that members of the UNHRC can condemn Israel at every
meeting—and they regularly do just that.
The UN
Security Council (UNSC) is anti-Zion. It doesn’t protect Zion. It considers
resolutions to harm Israel.
The “UN Special
Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories
occupied since 1967” is anti-Zion. It not only supports ‘refugees’; the
Rapporteur has worked actively to promote the Arab dream of conquering Israel.
The United
Nations Relief and Works Administration (UNWRA) is anti-Zion. UNRWA educates
‘Palestinian’ children. It teaches that all of Israel is ‘Palestine’. It
teaches that children must drive out the ‘Zionists’.
In fact,
wherever you go at the UN, you’ll find something anti-Zion on the agenda or in
the air. It would be a perfect match for an anti-Zion/anti-Semitic patron.
Who backs this
anti-Zion UN? In theory, all 193 Member States of the UN should support it. But
the reality is, many states spend more money on a car for a deputy Minister
than for any UN contribution. Some 35 of the UN Members give less than $29,000
USD each year.
Despite
these non-supporting Members, the UN does have one steadfast patron. It has a benefactor
whose support is greater than all other countries. The greatest benefactor of
the UN is the United States of America.
The US is a
generous provider. It gives billions to the UN. It is rumoured that the US
actually gives far more than that—mostly in private, under the proverbial radar
screen (“United States taxpayers on hook to the United Nations for
approximately $3.024 billion in 2015”, Human Rights Voices, May 7,
2015).
The UN has
it all: name-recognition, influence, an operational anti-Zion/anti-Semitic infrastructure
and the cover of Humanitarianism. It’s fortunate that the world’s greatest
supporter is the United States. That support means the UN can continue its
anti-Semitic work.
Of course,
that puts the US into a peculiar box. It means that the US—the supposed Citadel
of Freedom—is actually the world’s biggest supporter of anti-Semitism.
No comments:
Post a Comment