There is
something going on between Israel and US Secretary of State John Kerry.
Nobody’s been talking about it—except Kerry and the US State Department. They
can’t keep quiet about it.
The
proverbial cat jumped out of the proverbial bag last month when Israel Defense
Minister Moshe Yaalon was quoted as calling Kerry obsessive and messianic about
the peace process. This comment came from a conversation that was supposed to
be private. It was released by a newspaper said to be hostile to Netanyahu.
The US State
Department did not ignore Yaalon’s comments. They didn’t let the remarks pass.
They could
have let them pass. After all, the US and Israel are supposed to be friends.
They are supposed to be trusted allies. What’s wrong with the occasional sharp
word between trusted friends? Married couples have such exchanges. Office
workers have them. Professionals have them.
Stuff like
this happens. Someone says something intemperate. Another gets insulted.
Perhaps words are exchanged. Feelings are aired.
But then
trusted friends let the issue drop. They move on in order to allow trust and
friendship to heal.
But the US
State Department—and John Kerry—did none of that. Their combined reactions do not
suggest friendship or trust; and their continuing reactions certainly do not
suggest they are willing to let trust and friendship heal.
Something is
going on.
At first,
the State Department reacted with anger. ALMonitor reported that the
State Department felt that the nastiness of the comments was ‘unfitting of a
trusted ally’ (“Kerry responds forcefully to Israeli insults”, January 17,
2014).
Okay,
feelings were hurt. We get it.
But after
Kerry seemed to brush off any insult he might have felt, he brought it up
again, and then yesterday again (“Kerry hits back at Israeli critics, says he
won’t be cowed”, JTA, February 6, 2014).
Then,
yesterday, the State Department brought it up again (“State Department:
Attacks on Kerry Are Unacceptable”, Arutz Sheva, February 6, 2014).
Something is
going on.
To
understand what’s happening here, consider some questions:
-If Israel
is a trusted US ally, why doesn’t Kerry let the issue drop so that trust can
heal?
-If Israel
is a trusted ally, why did US President Obama himself participate in a personal
insult to Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in November, 2011—and then
refuse to apologize?
-If Israel
is a trusted US ally, why did we read that the US spied on Prime Minister Ehud
Olmert (“U.S. bought nearby apartment to spy on Ehud Barak, Israel suspects”, Haaretz,
December 22, 2013: this story contains information about US spying on Olmert as
well as Barak)?
-If Israel
is such a trusted US ally, why did the US also spy on the personal residence
of then-Defense Minister Ehud Barak (“US spied on Barak’s home from apartment
across the street”, Times of Israel, December 22, 2013)?
-If Israel
is a trusted ally why did former US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates declare
(incorrectly) that Israel never gave the US a thing in return for US aid it
receives?
-If Israel
is a trusted ally, why didn’t President Obama contradict Gates’ comment as ‘not
the position of the President or the Congress’?
-If the
Israel is a trusted ally, why does a high-ranking Israeli official believe that
the US is ‘holding a gun to Israel’s head’ in current Arab-Israel peace talks?
Something is
going on here. Kerry (and his State Department) keep hammering Israel for this
‘insult’. They won’t drop it.
Are the
wheels falling off this wagon?
No comments:
Post a Comment