Women of the
Wall (WoW) have a mission. They fight for freedom. They seek equality.
They want more
democracy in Israel. Specifically, they want the same rights as men. They want
to pray as equals at the Western Wall in Jerusalem. They want to wear men’s
prayer shawls.
For more
than 3,000 years, Judaism has made a distinction between men and women. But WoW
rejects this distinction.
They want
the legal right to pray like men. They can do that now—privately. What they
want is the right to do that in public, wherever they want. They say that
limiting women’s right to pray in public is not a prayer issue. Those
limitations are “a violation of civil rights, human rights and religious
freedoms” (see their Homepage). Therefore, they call their fight ‘social
advocacy’.
The WoW
Homepage says “we have NO ‘hidden agenda’, we have no secondary issue to
women’s free prayer at the Kotel and we are very careful to focus only on this
one issue.” But ‘social advocacy’ is not a term normally applied to prayer.
‘Social advocacy’ is the language of social activism. It is the language of Israel’s
Left as it battles in the name of ‘democracy’ for Arabs and against the State
of Israel.
It is also
the language of Reform Judaism, which battles in the name of ‘democracy’ to
change the nature of the Jewish religion in Israel.
Is WoW
connected to Reform Judaism’s goals for Israel? Is that possible? They say
their only goal is to pray; could they actually be doing something else--working
to assist a Reform religious agenda?
In America, Reform
Judaism is the most powerful Jewish group. Its watered-down version of religion
has brought to America a host of benefits: diversity, equality for women, non-Jewish
Jews, a 70+ per cent out-marriage rate, and a growing number of households
where children are raised under the demographic category called, ‘not-Jewish.’
Recently,
sociologist Steve Cohen—from the Reform’s own Hebrew Union College—had this to
say about orthodox and non-orthodox demographics: “for every 100 Orthodox
Jewish 50-year-olds, there are 230 Orthodox 10-year-olds, and for every 100
non-Orthodox 50-year-olds, there are 70 non-Orthodox 10-year-olds” (see Julie
Wiener, JTA, “Parsing Pew: New insights on Orthodox growth and
intermarriage offspring”, November 12, 2013).
That doesn’t
bode well for the future of non-orthodox Jewry in America. Reform leads the ‘non-orthodox’.
To some, it has facilitated the growth of an American Jewish demographic sector
that now raises its children ‘not Jewish’.
Now they want
to export their product to Israel. What does this have to do with WoW? Anat
Hoffman, Chairwoman of WoW, tells us in her WoW Homepage bio statement that she
is the executive director of the Israel Religious Action Center. This Center is
the legal and advocacy arm of the Reform Movement in Israel.
The leader of WoW is, in other words, part of Reform Judaism’s hierarchy.
Is her fight for prayer just another part of the Reform agenda?
In Israel, when it comes to those who fight for ‘change’, there are no
coincidences. WoW may indeed package its product as a fight for the
freedom to worship at the Western Wall. But its call for advocacy and diversity
is simply too close to the Reform worldview to be coincidence.
For many, Reform
Judaism has a Leftist religious agenda. But the Left in Israel isn’t just
interested in dismantling the influence of Orthodox Rabbis in Israel. The Left also
wants to dismantle Israel.
Hoffman is
part of the religiously Left Reform movement in Israel. Her vice-chair, Batya
Kallus, seems to be part of the politically Left ‘democracy’ movement in Israel.
Kallus works for The Moriah Fund. This organization aims to promote “Civil
Rights, Social Justice and Democracy in Israel”. It works with the New Israel
Fund, Israel’s premier Leftist NGO.
In Israel,
you are identified by the associations you have with others. You reveal what
you believe by the people you choose to spend time with.
I cannot say
that Anat Hoffman works with a Leftist agenda to dismantle the ‘fascism’ of the
Orthodox Rabbinate in Israel (a familiar wording of the Leftist Haaretz).
If I did that, WoW might sue me. They have already threatened others for
pointing out her Leftist associations.
So,
officially, I’m only telling you that WoW believes in freedom of religion for
women. They believe in more democracy for women. I just don’t know if they
believe in democracy for me.
I can’t give
Hoffman a label. She might threaten me. I can only tell you that, even though her
WoW Homepage says it has only one agenda—prayer-- Hoffman herself has been
quoted as saying, "I am also questioning why are the Orthodox the only
ones in charge of marriage and divorce in Israel?” (Arutz Sheva, “Women
of Wall Accused of Hiding True Intentions,” Arutz Sheva Staff, April 11,
2013).
This questioning
of who controls marriage and divorce in Israel has nothing to do with WoW’s supposedly
singular issue--prayer. But it is familiar: it is the very same question Reform
Judaism asks as it attempts to undercut traditional Jewish law in Israel. It is
also one element of Leftist attacks against Israel, something you discover upon
reading the Leftist Haaretz.
Is Hoffman,
as her Homepage unequivocally declares, interested only in prayer at the
Wall—or is she after something more?
I cannot tell
you. I cannot speak freely. I can only ask, if Anat Hoffman looks like a duck,
walks like a duck, associates with ducks and quacks like a duck, she isn’t a
duck?
I don’t want
to be sued. Therefore, here’s a disclaimer:
what you read about here are lies.
Women of the
Wall are freedom-fighters.
Viva
democracy!
No comments:
Post a Comment