In this world, there is both evil and righteousness. Evil
embraces what is bad. Righteousness embraces what is good. They are polar
opposites.
Evil brings destruction. Righteousness brings life. You
can’t get farther apart than that.
Evil and righteousness are moral terms. But they derive from religious ethics. They belong to religion.
Modern Man rejects
religion. He rejects religious ethics. He embraces only what he calls ‘Morality’.
The Human Rights movement is Modern Man’s moral replacement for
religion. It’s Modern Man’s version of a redemptive salvation: Mankind will not
be saved by G-d. Mankind will be saved through Universal Human Rights.
Human Rights has a Gospel. That Gospel is the 1948 Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). That Declaration suggests the redemptive
nature of ‘Human Rights’. Through Universal Human Rights, war will end. Peace
will reign. Mankind will
be safe.
That was the goal in 1948. Today, 2016, Human Rights are no
longer redemptive. They’re no longer moral.
The first ten days of 2016 have revealed that the Human
Rights movement is not righteous. Instead, it uses a false righteousness to
hide evil intent.
Two news stories reveal this truth. The first ‘story’ was an
investigative TV news segment about a ‘mole’ who had infiltrated into one of
Israel’s premier Human Rights NGOs (“Israeli Leftist Extremists Collaborate
with Palestinian Authority to Torture and Kill Arabs”, truthrevolt,
January 9, 2016). In that TV report, two Leftists bragged on video that they
participated in a scheme to assist the Palestinian Authority (PA) to torture
and execute Arabs (ibid).
In the PA, selling land to Jews is a crime. It carries the
death penalty (ibid). The scheme of these two Leftists was to find Arabs trying
to sell land to Jews—and then hand them over to the PA. One of the Leftists was
captured on tape saying, “The Palestinian Authority catches them and kills
them. But before it kills them, they get beat up a lot” (ibid).
The two men bragging about this atrocity were not untutored
Rights workers. They weren’t newly hired. They weren’t low-level. They were Israeli
Leftist superstars (Caroline Glick, “Column one: The Obama administration’s
most covert war”, Jerusalem Post, January 14, 2016). They knew exactly
what they were doing.
Under the guise of their secular moral righteousness (working to protect 'innocent' Arabs against 'evil' Jews), they used
torture and murder because they don't want Jews to buy land from Arabs. Under the
guise of Man’s universal morality, they committed unspeakable evil—killing
people who trusted them.
The second news story that interests us was the public response of one of the Human Rights NGO’s involved in this
scheme. That organization was B’tselem, a major anti-Israel NGO.
When the investigative news story named B’tselem as the
employer of one of the braggarts, B’tselem did not declare that it never
endorsed or supported such activity. It did not call for an investigation
to establish what was true in the report and what was false.
Instead, it acknowledged that such a scheme had been
used—and endorsed it (Matt Wanderman, “B'Tselem defends executing Palestinians
who sell land to Jews”, Arutz Sheva, January 8, 2016). It announced that
handing over an Arab for death was a Palestinian’s “only channel” when one Arab
doesn’t want another Arab to sell land to a Jew (ibid).
B’tselem also suggested that this scheme wasn’t part of its
Human Rights agenda, but was instead part of a private family dispute involving
one of the braggarts (ibid). But the video report didn’t show that braggart
referring to a family land dispute. That individual clearly boasted
about ‘them’; that is, Arabs he had ensnared in a sting operation to catch Arabs
attempting to sell land to Jews. The two men video-taped never suggested they were
talking about a private family matter.
Members of B’tselem’s ‘public council’ responded favourably
to the revealed scheme (Gil Ronen, “Famed leftist writers unruffled by B'tselem
exposé”, Arutz Sheva, January 10, 2016). No B’tselem council member contacted
for comment condemned the scheme (ibid).
There is something seriously wrong when a superstar Human
Rights Activist for a superstar Human Rights NGO turns against the Arabs he promises
to help, and hands them over to other Arabs to be tortured and murdered. That’s
not morality. That’s not righteousness. That’s evil in the guise of moral righteousness.
This is how Man has replaced religion.
While writing about this week’s Torah Portion (B’shalach,
Sh’mot 13:17-17:16), Rav Joseph B. Soloveitchik states that, at the
famous splitting-of-the-Sea episode in the Exodus story, HaShem demonstrated
that not only does He punish undisguised evil; He also punishes evil that’s
clothed beneath a false righteousness (Chumash Mesoras Harav, Sefer Shemos,
ed. Dr Arnold Lustiger, OU Press, 2014, p. 113 on Sh’mot 14:4). Rav
Soloveitchik then reports that the punishment for hiding evil beneath a false
righteousness is greater than the punishment for undisguised evil (ibid).
The Modern Human Rights movement doesn’t work to save
Israel. It isn’t redemptive. It’s evil. It seeks to destroy Israel.
‘Human Rights’ workers claim to be righteous. But beneath their
‘righteousness’, they hide an evil called, Jew-hate.
HaShem, the G-d of Israel, has a Story for you. It’s the
Story of the Final Jewish Redemption. In this Final Story, you will see what
happens to such evil.
No comments:
Post a Comment