In March
2015, after Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke to the US Congress
to criticize an Obama-built Iran deal, Americans rose to defend their president
against foreign criticism. For example, a poll taken by the Washington
Post-ABC News near the end of March showed that Americans supported a
nuclear deal with Iran by a nearly 2 to 1 margin (Scott Clement and Peyton M.
Craighill, “Poll: Clear majority supports nuclear deal with Iran”, Washington
Post, March 30, 2015).
A month
later, a Quinnipiac University poll showed a nearly identical result (“American
Voters Back Iran Deal By Wide Margin, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds”,
Quinnipiac University, Press release, April 27, 2015). 58 per cent of
Americans polled supported an Iran deal in April versus 59 per cent a month
earlier.
By July 17,
2015, days after a ‘deal’ with Iran had been announced, American support for
the deal had begun to erode. The margin in favour of a deal was no longer
‘nearly 2 to 1’. American support had fallen to just 43 per cent (“Poll:
Plurality support nuke deal with Iran — yet 59% say they’re not confident it’ll
stop an Iranian bomb”, hotair, July 17, 2015).
However,
while headlines about American support for a deal with Iran focused exclusively
on what per cent of Americans supported a deal, these same news reports
nevertheless revealed a darker side of American opinion—which few highlighted.
Yes, these polls showed, Americans wanted to see diplomacy instead of war
(hence, the support for a diplomatic ‘deal’). But these polls also revealed
that this support for ‘diplomacy’ never translated into positive feelings about
the outcome of such diplomacy.
For example,
in the March Washington Post-ABC News poll (above), 59 per cent of
Americans may have supported a deal. But almost the same per cent of Americans
(nearly 6 in 10) didn’t feel confident that a deal would actually prevent Iran
from getting a nuclear capability (ibid).
The month
before, a Gallup poll revealed that 77 per cent of Americans said the
development of nuclear weapons by Iran would be a ‘critical threat’ to the US
(Andrew Dugan, “As Nuclear Talks Progress, 11% in U.S. See Iran Favorably”, Gallup,
February 27, 2015). Then the April Quinnipiac poll (above) showed that 62 per
cent (up a few points) had little to no confidence that a deal could stop Iran
from getting nuclear weapons (ibid).
By July 17th,
as news spread that a deal was done, American pessimism over the effectiveness
of that deal remained high: a full 60 per cent of Americans didn’t believed
this deal would not stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons (hotair,
ibid).
Also by
July, 56 per cent of Americans saw Iran as an outright enemy of America (Emily
Swanson, “AP-GfK Poll: Ahead of nuclear deal, Americans narrowly back
diplomatic relations with Iran”, US News and World Reports, July 15,
2015).
The bottom
line for these polls is clear. (1) Americans prefer diplomacy over war—and
they’re willing to sign a deal with Iran if that deal could stop Iran’s nuclear
ambitions; (2) Americans don’t trust Iran to live up to its agreement to
curtail its nuclear pursuits (Nick Gass, “Poll finds majority of Americans do
not trust Iran to stick to deal”, Politico, July 14, 2015); and (3)
Americans see Iran as an enemy of the US.
In another July
poll (before the deal was announced), American attitudes towards the deal
appeared to be solidifying—against Obama (Greg Corombos, “Poll: 70% of
Americans say Iran would use nukes against U.S.”, WND, July 10, 2015).
The results of this poll suggest that Obama may not have the American public
behind him on this ‘deal’. For example:
-68 per cent
of Americans believed Iran will give nuclear weapons to terrorists if it can
develop them.
-80 per cent
believed Iranian nukes will set off a Middle East arms race.
-70 per cent
believed Iran would use nukes against U.S. forces in the region.
-79 percent
believed Iran having the bomb will mean their children will be threatened with
nuclear war in the years ahead.
Before this
deal was signed, some 6 of 10 Americans disapproved of President Obama’s
handling of negotiations with Iran (US News, ibid). So far, I have found
no polls posted since the deal was signed asking whether Americans
approve or disapprove of Obama’s handling of the Iran deal. But I don’t see
more Americans approving his handling of this deal.
Commentary
and analysis of the details of this deal undercut Obama’s optimism. The deal
seems more smoke and mirrors than the road to stopping Iran’s nuclear
ambitions. I can’t see that helping him in the polls.
As Obama
continues to sell this deal in the face of ongoing criticism, will American
public opinion turn against him? More important, if American public opinion
turns against Obama, will Democrats in Congress join Republicans to override a
President who threatens to veto any Congressional anti-Iran vote?
Stay tuned.
Americans still haven't weighed in on this deal.
No comments:
Post a Comment