The 2015 UN
Report on the 2014 Gaza-Israel war (“Report of the detailed findings of the
Commission of Inquiry on the 2014 Gaza Conflict”, ohchr. org) is an
attempt to identify war crimes committed in that war. It treats Israel and
Hamas as moral equals (Shahar Azani, “The world’s betrayal of Israel,” Huffington
Post, June 24, 2015). They are not.
The very
fact that this UN study treats Israel and Hamas as moral equals signals to you
that the Commission which wrote this Report doesn’t understand the challenges
of modern war. It doesn’t understand the laws of war (called, International
Humanitarian Law, or IHL), Israel’s commitment to those laws—or the extent to
which Hamas violates those laws.
Look at
modern war. In the 21st Century, war is a very complicated business. It’s no
longer just a military endeavour. Those days are gone.
The only way
an army can avoid committing war crimes today is to commit to the laws of war
(IHL). Today, an army needs more than an expertise in weapons, manpower allocation
and strategy to step onto a battlefield. It needs legal expertise.
The IDF has
that expertise (Willy Stern, “Attorneys at War: Inside an elite Israeli
military law unit”, The Weekly Standard, June 15, 2015). Hamas does not.
That’s one reason the IDF and Hamas are not moral equals.
One doesn’t
have to be some kind of moral rocket scientist to understand this distinction.
Nevertheless, the Commission which wrote this UN Report appears clueless about
it.
In the West,
most armies are not up to speed on making modern warfare ‘legal’ (ibid). If
tested, they’d fail the legal part of warfare (ibid).
There are
few armies in the world prepared to go to war legally. Around the world, many
argue that Israel has one of the best—if not the best--military capacity to
follow the laws of war (ibid).
Hamas has no
such capacity. This is another reason Hamas and the IDF are not moral equals.
But regarding this distinction, this UN Commission is clueless.
If the
Commission which wrote this document was competent, it would start its Report
with the most basic of moral war requirements: an army which is moral must
drill its personnel at every level on how to fight within the laws of war. There
is simply no other way to fight a war ‘legally’.
Israel commits
to such drill. Hamas does not.
This is
another reason Hamas and the IDF are not moral equals. Regarding this moral
training requirement, this UN Commission is clueless.
Think about
the importance of moral training in war. Every time a combatant shoots at
anyone, he runs the risk of committing an illegal act—a war crime. The laws of
war (IHL) are that strict. Yes, IHL certainly permits a combatant to shoot. But
a combatant has that legal permission only under specific, pre-determined conditions.
If he does not meet those conditions, he commits a war crime. If he never
learned about those conditions, he will commit war crimes. If he was told what
those conditions were but never trained in them, he will commit war crimes.
Israel’s
officers and soldiers are trained how to operate within those conditions. Hamas
offers no such training. Regarding this distinction, the Commission is
clueless.
The IDF and
Hamas are not moral equals.
Battle commanders
operate with even stricter rules. If a battle commander doesn’t understand the
conditions within which he must work, he, too, will commit war crimes (ibid).
Hamas doesn’t
train its commanders how to operate within those conditions. The IDF does.
Hamas and the
IDF are not moral equals.
Regarding
how commanders must be trained to fight morally, this UN Commission is
clueless. It thinks Hamas and the IDF are morally equal.
Hamas
fighters have no ethical training. IDF soldiers do. Hamas commanders have no commitment
to follow ethical rules. IDF commanders do. Hamas has no infrastructure in
place to help commanders fight within the laws of IHL. IDF does.
Hamas and
the IDF are not moral equals.
The
Commission suggests that it knows about laws of war (IHL). But it’s clueless
about how these laws work in war.
Here now is
a very tiny glimpse at how Israel fights its wars according to the laws
of war. This is just one example. As you read, you should keep in mind that no
other army in the world (ibid) fights this way (the following is a long excerpt
from the Willy Stern essay, above):
Look at two documents.
The first is from the IDF. The second is from Hamas.
The first
document is an IDF ‘target card’. It’s used when commanders prepare strikes
against enemy targets.
The cards
contain a wealth of information about each target from intelligence and
operations units. Before any attack can go forward, IDF legal advisers have to
sign off on that card. These lawyers must put their own check mark on the
card—they call it a ‘tick’—indicating that it’s a lawful target.
At that
point the target is approved. It’ll go forward unless the commander himself nixes
it.
Hamas has no
such protocol. It uses no lawyers. When Hamas attacks, it has no idea if its
attack is legal or not. It doesn’t even care if an attack is legal.
Hamas and
the IDF are not moral equals. The Commission, however, believes they are. The
Commission is clueless.
How can any
military win a war when it decides to fight with lawyers having the right to cancel
every attack? The question is irrelevant. This is how Israel fights.
The
Commission is clueless.
In Gaza, the
IDF prepared and used more than 4,000 of these target cards for strikes during
the 50-day conflict in July-August 2014. An attorney had to put a ‘tick’ on
every attack that met their standards before it could start (I understand that,
due to battlefield conditions, there are times when deliberation is impossible;
an attack must be initiated within seconds. I understand also that battle
commanders who work with lawyers during battle do have the discretion to act in
such split-second situations—and do so legally).
The second
document is from Hamas. It’s not an ethics manual. It’s not for verifying the
legality of actions in battle. It’s a ‘doctrine manual’ prepared by Hamas. It
was captured by IDF ground forces in Shejaiya, Gaza in early August, 2014. The
document advocates that fighters embed themselves among Gazan innocents, in the
hope that the IDF will kill civilians” (ibid).
Hamas and
Israel are not moral equals. It’s an absurdity to suggest they are. If the
Commission which wrote this Report fails to understand this distinction, it has
no business investigating for war crimes. It doesn’t understand the first thing
about ethical war.
No comments:
Post a Comment