The Pope likes
to travel. But he doesn’t travel alone. He travels with security, aides and a specially-built
protective vehicle.
Most of the
special vehicles he uses are bullet-proof—for good reason. In 1981, a Turkish Muslim,
Mehmet Ali Agca, shot the then-Pope (John Paul II) while the Pope was being
driven in an open, unprotected car through St Peters Square, in Vatican City. Since
then, the Vatican has used several different vehicles to transport the Pope so
that he could be visible to his worshippers but seated within a protective
‘chamber’.
The designs of
these ‘Pope mobiles’ vary, but the basic principle is to carry the Pope in a
bullet-proof glass-enclosed ‘box’ that sits behind and above a driver and security
guard. In this manner, the Pope rides above the normal car level, can be seen
from all angles, and is both protected and comfortably seated.
The purpose
of these ‘cars’ (some of which look like a highly-modified pick-up truck) is to elevate
the Pope’s seat, cruise at very low speed, and deter acts of violence against
the Pope.
But the
current Pope, Francis, has a reputation for avoiding his Pope mobiles. He
doesn’t like them. Instead, he prefers to travel in an ordinary car including,
we are told, an old Ford Focus with an estimated 186,000 kilometres on the
odometer.
Now, he
comes to a region where Christians are heavily persecuted by Muslims. Being
Christian is so dangerous within Arab-controlled areas (the Palestinian
Authority and Gaza), that most Arab Christians have fled. Will he travel here
with a bullet-proof Pope mobile?
No, he won’t.
He wants to be close ‘to the people’ (NBCnews.com). He will shun bulletproof
vehicles.
NBC said
that when local security officials requested that the Pope use a bullet-proof
vehicle, the Vatican over-ruled them. A Times
of Israel report suggested that those ‘local officials’ were not Jewish (“Pope
to drive in open-top cars on Middle East trip”, may 15, 2014). They were Arab
officials in Amman and Bethlehem.
They have
reason to want higher security for the Pope. Christians aren’t welcome in Arab
territories. In fact, because Muslim persecution of Christians is so intense, a
recent Pew report makes the striking observation that ‘Christians today are the
world’s most oppressed religious group (“Pope Francis’s Visit to Israel”, Rabbi
Benjamin Blech, aish.com, May 25, 2014). The Human Rights group, Open Doors,
has also recently published a World Watch List to rank the top 50 nations that
persecute Christians. The overwhelming majority of countries making the list –
and nine of the top ten worst offenders – are Muslim, including several Arab
countries (ibid).
In the end, the Pope did in fact bring a Pope mobile—but it wasn’t glass-enclosed. It
didn’t protect him with a bullet-proof chamber. It was, essentially, an
open-air vehicle.
Israel
should not have allowed it.
One of the
lessons Israel has learned in the weeks leading up to this Papal visit is that
the Catholic Church is very quick to blame Israel for actions taken by Muslims.
Catholic officials in Jerusalem have even gone so far as to demonize Israel by
calling anti-Catholic graffiti ‘Jewish acts of terror’—even though no Jews have
been arrested for the graffiti.
If you
missed the point of this accusation, consider this: vandalism in the form of
painted graffiti is not ‘terror’. What Arab Muslims do to Arab Christians is
‘terror’. Nevertheless, the Catholic Church in Jerusalem does not blame Muslims
for anti-Christian attacks in Arab-held areas. It blames Israel.
It claims
that Muslim anti-Christian attacks are caused by Israeli policies. Israel’s
presence and its need to protect itself provoke those attacks.
The Catholic
Church in Israel is anti-Israel. The Pope may not be far behind. On this visit,
he has called Mahmoud Abbas a ‘man of peace’ (“Pope to Abbas: You are known as
a man of peace”, Ma’an news service, May 25, 2014).
Abbas is not
a man of peace. Abbas calls convicted and often self-confessed Jew-killers
‘national heroes’. His new Fatah Party logo does not show ‘Palestine’
side-by-side with Israel. The logo shows the Arab ‘Palestine’ replacing Israel.
That’s not
peace. It’s conquest. It means the destruction of Israel.
Is that what
the Pope supports?
No comments:
Post a Comment