Israel
headlines tell a story. They tell you the news. But sometimes, they reveal some
underlying truths.
In this
report, you’ll see a sampling of headlines from Israel’s press—and some
comments about those headlines.
Today, we
look at—and comment on—more Chanukah headlines for the period, November 29 -30,
2013.
The war
against Israel
-Rising
violence in West Bank creeping toward Jerusalem
--UN chief
warns of ‘dangerous situation’ between Israel, Palestinians
-Germany and
Britain block Palestinian bid to join international olive trade group
-Palestinian
official says peace talks already failed
-Peace deal
still possible, Palestinian negotiator
-On ‘International Day of Solidarity with
Palestinian People,’ Ban Ki-Moon says he’s alarmed by escalation of violence,
incitement
-Lieberman:
Our lands are being robbed
The Arab war against Israel is going ‘hot’. Arab violence against Jews in Judea-Samaria increases.
Rising Arab violence creeps towards Jerusalem.
We have seen
this kind of violence spike before in Israel: it always appears when the West
tries to force peace on Israel. Arabs watch the West pressure Israel. But
instead of using that pressure to get a real peace agreement, they use it as an
excuse to incite violence against Jews.
It’s a
formula that never fails: when Israel bows before Western pressure, the Arabs
see Israel as weak—and vulnerable. Therefore, the more Israel back-pedals in
the face of Western pressure, the more anti-Jew violence we see.
Now we see this
increase of violence during our week of Chanukah. In case you forgot, our
Chanukah celebrates how Jews of old stood strong before those who would destroy
all that is Jewish.
In case you
forgot, Abbas and his Fatah Party have the same goal as our ancient enemies—the
destruction of the Jewish presence in Israel. If you question that, take a look
at the new Fatah Party logo. It’s a map of the new Arab ‘Palestine’ in place of
Israel.
What does
that tell you?
America
and Israel
-How sloppy
US diplomacy is empowering Iran
-Israeli
deputy minister: Kerry legitimizes terrorism
-US freed
top Iranian scientist as part of secret talks ahead of Geneva deal’
-Israeli
officials denounce Obama for giving Iran right to enrich, destroying sanctions
The US is
once again getting a black eye. First, an announcement appears in Israel that, as
part of secret Iran-US negotiations (which were hidden from Israel), the US
released from prison an important Iranian scientist, whose nuclear expertise
helps the Iranian nuclear enterprise. That release took place in April, 2013.
The inference
here seems clear: as Israel worked during 2013 to get the US to pressure
Iran—and as US President Obama kept telling Israel, ‘I’ve got your back’--the
US was actually aiding the Iranian
nuclear project by releasing one of their important nuclear scientists.
The announcement
of that release did not sit well with an Israel that has come to believe the
‘Iran deal’ was no deal at all. The release suggests that the US does not have
Israel’s interests in mind. The release seems tvalidate Israel’s sense of
betrayal by the US.
The Saudis,
meanwhile, are reported to characterize the US negotiation effort with Iran as
‘amateurish’ and ‘clumsy’. For example, the Times of Israel reported
that in 2010, White House Spokesperson Robert Gibbs declared that the
administration had no intention of allowing Iran to continue enriching uranium.
But as of November 2013, under the interim deal’s terms, that’s exactly what
the US has allowed--Iran can continue enrichment.
What does
that tell you?
Iran
-Iranian FM:
Tehran won’t attend nuclear talks if ‘Zionist regime’ present
-Rouhani:
We’ll keep enriching uranium as needed
-Rohani:
Iran will not dismantle nuclear sites
As if to
reinforce Israeli suspicions about Iran—and the failure of US diplomacy--we saw
Iran make three quick headlines during this news cycle, almost immediately
after the ‘deal’ was announced: first, Iran declared that it was going to
continue enriching uranium. Then, it announced that it wasn’t going to
dismantle any nuclear sites.
What does
that tell you about the ‘deal’?
These
announcements seemed to prove Israel’s case against Iran. Whatever Obama was
saying about this deal, Iran felt bold enough, in essence, to spit in the
West’s face: we’ll do what we want, it seemed to be saying. You can’t stop us!
Then Iran made
what seemed a curious announcement: it wouldn’t participate in any nuclear
talks if the Zionist entity (Israel) was present. Iran, of course, has good
reason to object to Israel: the Israeli’s won’t be so easy to fool or
manipulate.
What is Iran
telling the West here?
During this
news cycle, one unnamed Israeli official was quoted as suggesting that, under
the terms of this deal, he could see all sanctions against Iran collapsing
within months, leaving Iran totally free to do as it pleases.
Remember,
just a few days ago, the US announced that this deal will make Israel safer.
Do you believe
that?
The
Left’s war against Israel
-Livni
Encourages Students to Meet Abbas in Ramallah
Israeli
Justice Minister—and chief peace negotiator for the current round of peace
talks—Tzipi Livni has stepped into a controversy that had been unfolding within
an Israeli student organization. It seems that some in the organization wanted
to meet with Mahmoud Abbas, head of the Palestinian Authority. Others did not
want to meet with Abbas. Livini stepped in to encourage the students to go to
Ramallah, so they could, she suggested, add their voice to the push for peace.
Her
reasoning was that Israel is at risk. She claimed to the press that Israelis
who live over the Green Line have provoked Europe to boycott Israeli research
and academicians, thereby validating a student concern.
She has been
horrified by this threat. She has been horrified by Jews living in Judea-Samaria
which, by the way, is for many in Israel ancestral Jewish national homeland.
She gives
the impression that, if Europe speaks crossly to Israel about our ancestral
land, she must be first in line to bow to Europe’s demands. She must be first
to do whatever Europe wants.
It’s all
about Europe, you see. We can’t anger Europe.
The same
goes for the US. We must never do anything to anger the US.
What’s wrong
with this approach? It shows Israel to be needy and weak. It suggests that
Israel is a country whose national integrity can only be determined by others.
No one
respects that. No one respects a Jew who says he’d give up something as
precious as ancestral land to please the non-Jewish bully.
Such behaviour
announces, we are afraid of you. It says, please don’t hurt us.
Is that what
we are?
Is that what
Livni is?
This is the
week of Chanukah. Chanukah is the story of Jews standing up to foreign bullies.
What kind of Chanukah story is Livni writing for the Jewish people?
No comments:
Post a Comment