Everyone
knows that Iran wants a nuclear bomb. Everyone knows that Arabs want to remove
Israel from the world map. But no one talks about Iran or Arabs as a threat to
world peace.
They talk
about Israel. Israel may be the target for annihilation, but the threat to
peace is not the ‘bomb’ of Iran or the hate of the Arab. The threat is Israel—the
intended victim.
This is not coincidence.
History has been moving us to this point since World War Two—or earlier. Our past
is parent to today’s drama.
History is
strange. We live it. It’s all around us. But we don’t understand it. It doesn’t
unfold on a single plane; it unfolds simultaneously on multiple planes until,
at some point, those planes converge: the United Nations is formed out the
ashes of a horrific world war against tyranny; the UN immediately initiates a
drive to create peace-in-the-world so that Man can rid the world of the scourge
of war; the state of Israel is formed; Islamic Arabs initiate a relentless war against
Israel; militant Islam spreads aggressively to Europe; the desire for peace
becomes so pervasive that world-wide movements for ‘peace’ and ‘justice’ grow
strong; Jews experience a world-wide
religious revival and begin to populate Jewish ancestral homeland in Israel; Jihadists
attack America and put Islam in the spotlight; a new President of the United
States begins an aggressive campaign to sell Islam as a ’religion of peace’; Leftists
who want ‘justice and peace’ and Jihadists who want the land of Israel join
together to destroy Israel for ‘peace’; and finally, Israel is pressured to
yield—for peace-- to Arab demands even as an Arab official says he would nuke
Israel immediately if he had ‘the bomb’.
As hate and peace converge on Israel, the arc of
history begins to come into focus. We can see how intense is the desire for
peace—and how vicious is the hate against Israel.
Since World
War Two, a new code of International Law has developed. This new code, focused
on ‘peace’, creates a new argument--and legal force--against the Jewish state:
after World War Two, Jews from a war-torn Europe flooded ‘illegally’ into ‘Palestine’. A few years later, 1948, these Jews,
outsiders to ‘Palestine’, declared their own state, ‘illegally’ taking Arab land
to do so. Since then, Israel has ‘illegally’ expanded its borders through war.
Therefore, virtually everything Israel has done since its inception is illegal.
The
defenders of International Law believe there can never be peace when such
‘illegality’ exists.
The UN (mentor
for world law-and-order) has not yet decided to unmake this allegedly illegal Israel. But a UN agency now prints
maps with ‘Palestine’ in place of Israel. The message cannot be any clearer:
the United Nations would join with the Arab to anticipate a future without
‘Israel’.
The British
Leftist Jenny Tonge has been quoted as saying that the single greatest obstacle
to world peace is terrorism—and Israel causes that terrorism. Her inference is
clear: to destroy the greatest obstacle to world peace, destroy the cause of
terrorism.
For world
peace, destroy Israel.
Since the UN
has condemned Israel more times than all other nations combined, a world
without Israel makes sense. World peace
without Israel certainly sounds good to a lot of people: Humanists, atheists, Leftists,
academicians and many human rights organizations. It also sounds good to
Muslims.
Muslims may
have actually been the first to promote Israel as the obstacle to peace. Article
22 of the PLO/Fatah Charter declares that peace will come when the Zionist presence
is destroyed. That was written in 1968. Does the world now sing the same song?
Christian leaders might sing that song. In the last
three years, several Christian denominations have described Israel as illegal, unjust
and immoral. The Church of Scotland has most recently attempted to invalidate
the Jewish religion itself.
Together,
Muslims, Christian leaders, atheists and Humanists add up to a world majority—as
much as two-thirds of the world’s 7 billion people. How many are anti-Israel?
That’s an important
question because at the UN, the majority rules. Muslims alone make up more that
twenty-five per cent of the UN. Do other nations join them against Israel? How
many believe that the closer Iran gets to a nuclear bomb, the more dangerous Israel becomes to world peace?
Many seem
eager to remove Israel from the world map. Now, even the leader of Man’s drive
for world peace and justice—the UN—appears to support that call.
Man’s
message is clear: it doesn’t matter if Israel is G-d’s beloved (the Song of Songs). Man is in charge,
not G-d; and to prove it, Man rejects what G-d loves.
The planes
of history converge: the UN versus Israel; Man versus G-d.
The arc of
history pulls the world to the G-d of Israel. Are you surprised?
No comments:
Post a Comment