‘Sacralized’ Jew-Hate?

Here’s a news flash: there might be something new under the sun. It isn’t Jew-hate. Jew-hate is old. It’s old-fashioned. It’s out of style.

What’s new is ‘sacralized’ Jew-hate. That’s Jew-hate that’s become part of a religion’s theology.

Of course, this might not be as new as you think. Some Christians may have already ‘sacralised’ Jew-hate. They blame Jews for killing the Christian god. Such blame means that anti-Semitism (Jew-hate) has become intertwined into Christianity’s basic theology.

But ‘sacralization’ isn’t about Christianity. Christianity is old-fashioned. This Jew-hate is about something new. It’s about Islam.

‘Sacralization’ means to imbue an idea with a religious significance. It suggests that an idea has been incorporated into religious theology, to make that idea part of religious teaching.

The word has recently shown up in an essay about Islamic Jew-hate (“Sunni Islam’s “Vatican”: Jews Responsible For Jihad Terrorism”, Family Security Matters, October 3, 2014).  This essay argues that Islamic Jew-hate is real and pervasive—and has a religious source. That source isn’t maverick clerics in Pakistan or Bethlehem. The source is Al Azhar University, in Cairo, Egypt.

Al Azhar appears to be a main Islamic teaching center. Its mission (and the mission of its related Mosque) is to spread Islamic religion and culture. It’s considered to be “the de facto Vatican of Sunni Islam” (ibid).

According to the essay’s author (Andrew G. Bostom), the leader of Al Azhar University has great power. He has a major educational pulpit from which to spread his brand of Islam.

Bostom characterized the brand of Islam that comes from this University as an “unreformed, unrepentant jihad bellicosity and infidel hatred” (ibid). Bostom claims it promotes a “sacralized Islamic animosity” that is directed, unsurprisingly, against Jews (ibid).

To call Islamic Jew-hate ‘sacralized’ might be a stretch. Bostom’s essay isn’t complete. He doesn’t define ‘sacralization’. He doesn’t demonstrate how it’s different from the good old-fashioned of Jew-hate found in some Christian doctrine. He doesn’t validate how it manifests itself within Islam outside the Al Azhar University.

Still, it’s an interesting characterization. It suggests that, at some level, Jew-hate has been rationalized into Islam. It suggests that a conscious process of religious institutionalization places Jew-hate at the center of modern Islamic practice.

Is he correct?

Bostom argues that he is correct. He says that Islam's canon--the Koran, the hadith and the sira--are redolent with Islamic Jew-hate (ibid). Jew-hate is, in other words, already part of Islam’s basic religious texts (since some deny this, the question is, who’s right about Islam’s basic texts? Bostom believes he is).

Bostom argues that Jew-hate references from these texts have been catalogued by the late Sunni Muslim Papal equivalent, Sheikh Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, who served as the Grand Imam of Sunni Islam's Vatican, Al Azhar University, for 14 years, from 1996, till his death in March, 2010.  Tantawi's "academic" magnum opus, a 700 page treatise entitled, "Jews in the Koran and the Traditions", includes this catalogue of Jew-hate. Bostom then says that Tantawi concludes his magnum opus on the Jews by sanctioning harsh discrimination (what he calls bigoted, even violent behaviour) towards Jews (ibid).

Tantawi's successor, Ahmad Al-Tayeb, the current Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, picks up this anti-Jew thread where Tantawi left off. In an interview which aired on Channel 1, Egyptian TV, October 25, 2013, Al-Tayeb discussed how the Koran has inspired Muslim hatred of Jews since the advent of Islam (ibid). Bostom quotes Al-Tayeb as having said,

“A verse in the Koran [5:82] explains the Muslims' relations with the Jews...This is an historical perspective, which has not changed to this day. See how we suffer today from global Zionism and Judaism...Since the inception of Islam 1,400 years ago, we have been suffering from Jewish and Zionist interference in Muslim affairs".

If the Koran is quoted this way in order to demonize or attack  Jews and Zionism, do we conclude that modern Islam (our only concern here) ‘sacralizes’ Jew-hate? You’ll have to decide that for yourself.

In the end, of course, it doesn’t matter what we call the demonization of Jews, Judaism and Zionism. Whatever we call it—church-sanctioned or sacralized--all of it should be repulsive.

It isn’t. No one in Islam seems to care enough to speak out against such discriminatory language. No one in the West cares enough, either.

What people in the West do care about these days, however, is that Bostom dares to criticize Islam. Instead of addressing his criticism, they will call him an ‘Islamophobe’. They will demand he be censured. Then they will ignore his criticism.

The G-d of Israel has a Story He wants to you see. That Story is the unfolding of the Final Redemption of the Jewish people.

Will ‘sacralized’ Islamic Jew-hate and Western acceptance of such hate play a role in fulfilling Biblical Jewish prophecy? Stay tuned.

Meanwhile, read your Tanach. Watch your Evening News.

The G-d of Israel won’t disappoint you.

 

Arab propaganda: where every word about Israel is a lie

The Arab propaganda war against Israel is not just a criminal enterprise. It isn’t just a political or ideological version of a consumer ad campaign. It isn’t just Jew-hate.

It’s a combination of all three. It’s an organized, scripted, planned program.

It controls the definition of terms used to describe the Arab-Israel war. It uses those definitions to demonize, isolate and criminalize Israel.

Arab propaganda is designed for a world immersed in media and internet. It manufactures Jew-baiting messages for international and national audiences. It uses its manufactured language and images to prepare the world to accept total war against Israel and its Jews. It packages news. It produces TV images. It shapes words and pictures to create a narrative of Arab innocence being brutalized by the oppressive, criminal Jew—who must be stopped at any cost.

Take a look at how Arab propaganda handled a recent terror attack in Jerusalem. Last week, a three-month old Jewish infant and a 22-year old woman were murdered.

Israel’s press reported the incident as a terror attack (“Baby killed as car rams crowd in Jerusalem terror attack”, Times of Israel, October 22, 2014). An Arab had driven his car up onto a Light Rail waiting platform. He then accelerated at high speed (for the narrow space he was in) down the length of the platform, killing the infant and injuring eight. The 22-year old woman died four days later. The Arab driver was himself killed as he jumped from his car and tried to run away.

Hamas ran the story differently. It didn’t see a terrorist using his car to kill Jews. It saw, “Palestinian driver dies of Israeli gunshot injuries”, Palestinian Information Center, October 23, 2014). It suggested that an innocent ‘youth’ had been killed by Jews (“Renewed violence in J'lem after killing of Palestinian youth at rail station”, ibid, October 23, 2014).

Hamas used this incident to incite for more violence against Jews (“Hamas, Islamic Jihad salute Jerusalem terror attack, threaten new 'Palestinian intifada' in capital”, Jerusalem Post, October 23, 2014). One Hamas official, Mahmoud Zahar, described the call for more violence with the words,  "Escalating the resistance in the city is the solution to Israeli aggression" (“Hamas Official Declares Intifada in Jerusalem”, Arutz Sheva, October 25, 2014).

Remember that word, ‘escalating’. Hamas used it to call for more Arab violence against Jews. You’ll see in a moment how Arab propaganda used the same word to demonize Israel, not Arab violence.  

Look at how Hamas used the phrase, ‘Israeli aggression’. Hamas calls attacks against Jews ‘resisting Israeli aggression’.

When you live in Israel, you come to understand what ‘Israeli aggression’ is: it’s the physical presence of Jews on land claimed by Muslims as theirs.

To the Arab, the very existence of Jews in Israel is an ‘aggression’ against Islam. Therefore, the Muslim must ‘resist’ that ‘aggression’ (presence).

In the case of this terror attack, ‘Israeli aggression’ took on a more sinister meaning. It meant that Jews had killed a Muslim Jew-killer.

To the Muslim, a Jew has no right to do that. The Jew is on ‘Muslim’ land. Killing a Muslim Jew-killer is an intolerable ‘aggression’.

Hence, the riots and the violence.

Manufactured language creates a moral high ground for the Arab cause. That ‘cause’ is to destroy Israel. The moral high ground is to purify ‘Palestine’--to remove all Jews from Israel so that the land remaining can be renamed, ‘Palestine’.

The world loves Arab propaganda. It presents such a clear message. To borrow a phrase that captures the ultra-modern nature of Arab propaganda, it’s ‘hybrid warfare’ (“Seeking For The Ukrainian Left,” Ari Rusila’s BalkanBlog, October 1, 2014). It’s a carefully crafted ‘theatre of mediawar with constant disinformation’ (ibid) flowing from multiple sources.

Hamas is one of those sources. Mahmoud Abbas is another. Remember how Hamas described its call for more violence against Jews as a call for ‘escalation’? Well, Palestinian Authority leader Abbas has reportedly sent an ‘urgent’ message to US President Obama about ‘the escalation of violence in Jerusalem’. He wants the US to intervene, to stop that escalation.  

But he’s not talking about the escalation Hamas had called for. He’s talking about Israel.

Abbas wants the US to end Israel’s actions aimed at defending itself against Arab violence. He wants the US to end ‘Israeli escalation’ (“Abbas to Obama: Stop 'Israeli Escalation' in Jerusalem”, Arutz Sheva, October 27, 2014).

Hamas accuses Israel of ‘aggression’ when it is itself guilty of aggression. Abbas accuses Israel of ‘escalating violence’ when it is the Arab who escalates violence.

Virtually every word about Israel is a lie.

The G-d of Israel has a Story for you. It’s the Story of the Final Jewish Redemption. Do you think Arab lies about Israel will play a role in that Story?

Stay tuned. The G-d of Israel won’t disappoint you.

 

 

 

 

Intifada hysteria, cowardly Jews and gentile indifference

Since May-June, 2014, Arab attacks against Jews in Israel’s capital city Jerusalem have sky-rocketed. Attacks have risen more than 500 per cent (“Hamas Official Declares Intifada in Jerusalem”, Arutz Sheva, October 25, 2014). The attacks have gotten so bad that this morning (Sunday, October 26, 2014), Haaretz describes Arabs attacks over the last two days as a “Weekend of stones, flames and blood in East Jerusalem”. Arutz Sheva reports, “Jerusalem is Simmering: 1,000 Additional Forces Sent to Capital” (October 26, 2014).

The frequency—and intensity—of these attacks has prompted more than one observer to call this the ‘third intifada’ (“Israel-Gaza conflict: What is an intifada?”, The Telegraph, July 25, 2014). Certainly, Hamas loves the riots  (“Hamas, Islamic Jihad salute Jerusalem terror attack, threaten new 'Palestinian intifada' in capital”, Jerusalem Post, October 23, 2014).  It has even called this latest cycle of violence in Jerusalem an ‘Intifada against Israeli aggression’ (“Hamas Official Declares Intifada in Jerusalem”, Arutz Sheva, October 25, 2014).  

Hamas knows how to create International pressure against Israel. It knows how to manipulate news and images produced for TV.

Making matters worse, Jewish Leftists feed on everyone’s fears. They write essays that attempt to scare us. They wring their hands. They highlight our weaknesses. They ennoble the Arab ‘cause’. They argue that our only choice is to surrender.

For example, one of the first of these ‘Intifada’ essays suggests that if Israel doesn’t soon figure out how to surrender to the Arabs, the entire Arab world will unite, an Islamic tide will overthrow Jordan’s King Hussein--and then they’ll come after us (“Jerusalem is a time-bomb, and Israel can't hear the ticking”, YNET, October 24, 2014).

The provocation for this fearful assessment was an incident that took place about ten days ago up on the Temple Mount. To protest Jews ascending to the Temple Mount, Arabs threw Molotov cocktails at Israeli police from inside the Al Aqsa mosque. Police responded with riot-dispersal means. “Sparks flew everywhere. All that remained was for the carpets to catch alight, the mosque to go up in flames and the entire Muslim world – Shias and Sunnis as one – to forget their differences and come running” (YNET, ibid).

We are supposed to infer from this argument that Jewish presence on the Mount must be stopped. Otherwise, Israel will enrage Islam to attack us.

G-d forbid Jews should make ‘Islam’ angry. If we do that, Arabs could set the Mosque alight. They’ll blame Jews. The time-bomb will explode. We’ll all be dead.

It’s nonsense. It’s Intifada hysteria. It assumes that if we surrender to Arab demands, we’ll be safe.

That’s a lie. All these hysterics have to do is read either the Hamas or the PLO Charters. They won’t have to read both. Each Charter says the same thing: the Jew must be expelled from Israel so that ‘Israel’ can be renamed, ‘Palestine’.

Our problems won’t be solved by surrendering. They’ll just begin. The moment Muslims take over Jerusalem, they’ll offer every Jew there a choice: convert, leave or die.

The YNET essayist promotes ‘Intifada hysteria’. He believes that we fool ourselves if we fight against Arab anger. He suggests that resisting that anger will only prove how stupid and arrogant we have become.

He’s wrong. Given the intensity of Arab Jew-hate, surrender is not an option.

If we want to stay in  Israel, we have to fight. We have to stand up. We have to start believing in G-d. We have to stop believing in gentiles.

Unfortunately, Israel’s leaders believe in gentiles. They believe that gentiles will protect us—but only if we comply with their demands for a ‘two-state solution’ and give Jerusalem to the Muslim.

Our leaders reject G-d. They bow to gentiles who remain silent as a stone. They’ve become emotional and spiritual beggars. They beg to be loved by stone-faced non-Jews.

They believe in people who now stand in stony silence as Muslims rise up to destroy us.  

Gentile nations don’t help us. So far as they’re all concerned, Jerusalem isn’t even Jewish. Jerusalem doesn’t belong to Jews. For them, Jerusalem belongs to the Arab.

That’s why they don’t object when Arabs riot against Jews in Jerusalem. That’s why they don’t defend us.

Our defense and our strength come from G-d, not Man. We will grow strong when our leaders turn to G-d; we will grow weak when they reject Him.

The G-d of Israel talks to us. He has a Story for you. It’s the Story of the Final Jewish Redemption. Can you figure out how Arab riots, cowardly Jews and the world’s stony indifference will play a role in that Story?

Think about it. For more information, read your Tanach. Study your Heritage. Study the commentaries.

Stay tuned. This Story is just beginning.

The G-d of Israel won’t disappoint you.

 

 

 

The new Circus Maximus: Israeli politics

Politics at the national level in Israel are brutal. Israel is not a two- or three-Party political system. It’s not even a four-party system.

Israeli national politics are more like a fight-club. Here, multiple Parties team up to fight other Parties. Then they turn and fight each other.

Right now, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has a ruling coalition made up of five Parties (leader’s names in parenthesis): Likud (Benjamin Netanyahu), Yisrael Beiteinu (Avigdor Liberman), Habayit HaYehudi (Naftali Bennet), Hatenua (Tzipi Livni) and Yish Atid (Yair Lapid).

Each of these Party leaders serves as a Minister in the government. Each has power. It’s a safe bet that each wants to be Prime Minister.

Sometimes, these leaders work together as a team. Sometimes, they don’t. Sometimes, they won’t.

This week, we learned that Prime Minister Netanyahu seems to believe that some in his coalition aren’t cooperating enough with his political agenda. He appears to have problems with Livni, Lapid and Bennet (“Netanyahu to Tell Party Heads: Compromise or Else...”, Arutz Sheva, October 22, 2014). According to this story, he’s threatening to call for new elections if the coalition doesn’t start following his orders.

But that same day another news stories emerged. Netanyahu wasn’t planning new elections after all (“New elections? Netanyahu says they’re the last thing Israel needs”, Times of Israel, October 22, 2014).

Well, which is—will Netanyahu call for new elections, or not? In Israel, the answer is simple: he’ll do both--maybe!

Make no mistake: there’s trouble afoot. Within Netanyahu’s ruling coalition, there are tensions that threaten to break things apart. There’s tension over a bill in the Knesset to change the rules for religious conversions (to Judaism). There’s tension over peace talks with Mahmoud Abbas. There’s tension over next year’s budget.

These tensions won’t go away. Open warfare, never far from the surface among people who so disagree with each other, is close to breaking out.

To keep the lid on, Netanyahu needs to act. He needs to crack the whip.

He’s doing that by sending his coalition a message: fall in line behind me, get ready to compromise your ideological positions to vote my way—or I’ll call new elections.

That’s a real threat.

For example, Tzipi Livni, Justice Minister, could end up out of politics altogether if an election were held next Spring, as some reports speculate could happen. She has no reason to want new elections—and almost every reason to avoid them.

Yair Lapid, Finance Minister, could see his power base shrink considerably as a result of new elections. He controls Israel’s purse strings. Israelis aren’t happy with some of his decisions. He hasn’t yet succeeded in proving to the Israeli public that his austerity moves have improved the economy. An election before he’s got that ‘proof’ could push him into a political oblivion. 

Then there’s HaBayit HaYehudi’s Naftali Bennet. Recent polls show him gaining seats in a near-term election. His enemies in the political arena won’t want to see him gain that power. A Spring election that benefits Bennet would be the worst thing that could happen to them (“Analysis: Who’s afraid of Moshe Kahlon?”, Jerusalem Post, October 22, 2014).

Israel’s politics aren’t driven by religious law. They aren’t driven by what’s best for Israel. They aren’t driven by oligarchs, class considerations or any kind of social agenda. They’re driven by raw power.

If you want to lead Israel, you have to know how to attract allies who might normally hate each other—and you. Then, you have to be able to keep them happy. Then, you have to know how to keep them in line. Finally, you have to know how and when to threaten them so that they stay in line.

Then, while you’re doing all that, you have to watch out for outsiders who want to destroy Israel altogether. You also have to watch out for politicians (some of whom are your supposed allies) who are looking for any reasonable excuse to destroy your coalition, thereby provoking new elections—so they can replace you.

Of course, while you’re doing all of that, you still have to do something for Israel. You still have to govern.

In ancient Rome, the Circus Maximus was entertainment for the masses. Chariots raced, often destroying each other. Lions ate humans, then, possibly, each other. Gladiators fought to the death. This circus was often flamboyant, bloody and celebratory.

Why must Jewish Israel make politicians behave this same way? Does Israel benefit from it? Are we safer because of it?

The G-d of Israel has a Story for you. It’s the Story of the Final Jewish Redemption. Do you think Israel’s current political fight-arena will play a role in that Story?

Stay tuned.

Jews die. The world yawns. Events spiral forward

For many in Israel, it has been obvious for decades that Arabs do not seek peace with Israel. The Hamas Charter, the PLO Charter, Palestinian Authority (PA) TV, Muslim political and religious leaders all make it clear that the Arab has no interest in any kind of peace with Jewish Israel.

The world doesn’t care about Arab Jew-hate. The world only cares that those damn Jews hate peace, right?

Here’s how that thought-process works: last year, I was interviewed for a news special for Finnish TV. I was told that the topic of discussion was the ‘two-state’ solution. I was asked, why doesn’t Israel want peace? I replied, you ask the wrong question. The correct question is, why does Mahmoud Abbas refuse peace?

Surprised, the interviewer asked, what do you mean? I replied, go visit Mr Abbas. While you’re there, take a look at the Fatah Party logo. It’ll be on display at his office. He’s the leader of Fatah. Look at his logo. It’ll show an artistic rendering of the Arab ‘Palestine’ on a map. The ‘Palestine’ depicted on that map doesn’t sit beside Israel. It replaces Israel. On that map, Israel has disappeared.

Therefore, I said, so long as that logo exists, the Arab will not make peace with Israel. That’s not on the Arab agenda. The Arab agenda is to conquer Israel, not live beside it. Go ask Mr Abbas, why do you want to remove Israel from the map?

My interview never made it to broadcast. It did not, I was told, address the ‘two-state’ question. It was, I was told, off-topic.

Many in Israel understand what the Arab here wants. He wants Jews dead. That’s why Arabs stone Jewish buses in Jerusalem. That’s why Arab youth hurl firebombs at Jewish homes in Jerusalem. That’s why, yesterday, an Arab drove his car into a crowd of Jews waiting at a light-rail train stop—and killed a three-month old infant.

The Arabs don’t want ‘peace with Jews’. That’s not in their lexicon. It’s certainly not in their education curriculum. In school, they’re taught that Jews stole their land. That ‘stolen’ land isn’t ‘Area C’ of Judea-Samaria—the main focus of the ‘two-state’ discussion. It’s Haifa, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Jaffa, Acco, etc—Jewish cities on the Mediterranean coast.

The UN, US and EU all say these cities are and will remain Jewish. They aren’t part of the ‘two-state’ peace negotiation process.

Arabs don’t accept that. They say there’ll be peace only when the entire ‘Zionist entity’ (Jewish Israel) has been ‘liberated’ (see the PLO Charter, Article 22). In case you missed the point, ‘liberated’ means taking that land away from Jews.

The Arabs want the UN, US and EU to help them conquer Israel. But they won’t wait. They want Israel now. They lust for Jerusalem now. That’s why they attack the hated Jew-enemy on the streets of Jerusalem.

Hamas saw nothing wrong with the killing of a three-month old Jewish baby. It reported that 23-year old Abdul-Rahman Al-Shaludi had been killed by [Jewish] settler gunfire in an accident in which “a group of settlers” had been run over in a neighbourhood of “occupied Jerusalem” (“Palestinian driver dies of Israeli gunshot injuries”, Hamas news, October 23, 2014). A Hamas spokesman declared that the attack was “a natural response to the crimes of the occupation and invasion of our land by the Jews” (“Hamas Welcomes Baby's Murder in J'lem Attack”, Arutz Sheva, October 23, 2014).

Then, in answer to the Arab claim that the entire incident was just ‘an accident’, CCTV video at the scene showed how the driver of the car had directed, guided and controlled his vehicle as he drove at high speed through a narrow space and hit the victims without stopping (“Chilling New Video Shows Terror Attack No 'Accident'”, Arutz Sheva, October 23, 2014).

The supposedly ‘moderate’ Palestinian Authority hailed the driver as a “hero” (“Senior Abbas Aid Lauds Jerusalem Terrorist as a 'Heroic Martyr'”, Arutz Sheva, October 23, 2014). That driver wasn’t innocent. He had links to Hamas (“Baby girl killed in Jerusalem is an American, US official says”, Jerusalem Post, October 23, 2014).

This morning (October 23, 2014), Arabs continued their attacks against Jewish children. They attacked a Jewish kindergarten in Jerusalem with stones (“After Infant's Murder, Arabs Attack Jerusalem Kindergarten”, Arutz Sheva, October 23, 2014).

The Arabs want to conquer Israel. They want Jerusalem. They consider Jewish death and injury the price the usurping Jew-pig must pay for ‘stealing’ Jerusalem.

We have buried an innocent infant. Our children are terror targets. The world demonizes us. But it yawns at the Jew-hate that explodes around us in our capital city.

We are under attack.

The G-d of Israel has a Story for you. It’s the Story of the Final Jewish Redemption. Do you think that baby-killing Arabs celebrated as ‘heroes’ will play a role in that Story?

Stay tuned.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

 

The ‘Palestine cause’ leaps forward

Until about three weeks ago, no country in Europe had formally declared its intent to recognize a new state called, ‘Palestine’. Until that point, the specific call to recognize ‘Palestine’ seemed to be limited mostly to small and out-of-the-way nations. European nations appeared to be staying on the side-line.

Now, that’s about to change. In fact, beginning earlier this month, it might have already changed.

On October 3, 2014, Sweden’s new Prime Minister stated his intent to recognize ‘Palestine’ in his very first speech as Prime Minister (“Sweden to recognise state of Palestine”, The Guardian, October 3, 2014). At the time this happened, some wondered if Sweden was just the beginning of a pro-‘Palestinian’ domino effect (“Swedish Recognition of 'Palestine' - A Sign of Things to Come?”, Arutz Sheva, October 7, 2014).

We didn’t have to wait long to get an answer to that question. One week later, Britain’s House of Commons voted overwhelmingly (272 to 12) to “recognise the state of Palestine alongside the state of Israel” (“Palestine vote: MPs take historic decision to recognise Palestinian state “, The Independent, October 13, 2014).

Now, less than ten days after that vote, Ireland appears ready to become the third European country to hop onto the Arab bandwagon (“Irish parliament calls on government to recognize Palestine”, Times of Israel, October 22, 2014).

Unlike the British vote, which specifically declared support for a ‘Palestinian’ state ‘alongside Israel’ [emphasis mine], the Irish declaration makes no such clarification. Like the Swedish Prime Minister’s announcement, this one asks the Irish Government “to recognise the State of Palestine” in order to implement a two-state solution (ibid).  

At almost the exact same moment Irish politicians were telling their government to recognize ‘Palestine’ (on October 22, 2014), an Israeli newspaper revealed it had obtained an internal EU document that spelled out a plan to step up pressure against Israel (“EU seeks talks with Israel over ‘red lines’ in West Bank,” Haaretz, October 22, 2014). That document also identified instructions for the EU to deliver “a sharp message to Israel in the name of all EU members” (ibid).

Will October, 2014 go down in history as the tipping point for the world’s war against Israel? It could be. This morning, Herb Keinon quoted an Israeli official as commenting, “The European Union is asking Jerusalem to weave the rope with which they will come to hang Israel”, (“Israeli official: EU proposal to negotiate West Bank redlines is a death warrant”, Jerusalem Post, October 23, 2014).

As if to put an exclamation point on that phrase, ‘death warrant’, Israel’s news today headlined the burial of a three-month old Jewish baby murdered yesterday in a terrorist attack inside Jerusalem (“Baby Murdered in Jerusalem Laid to Rest”, Arutz Sheva, October 23, 2014).

While the floodgates of European support for ‘Palestine’ appear to be opening (Spain could soon become the fourth European nation to ‘recognize’ ‘Palestine’), Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon visits Washington, DC. Last night, He told an American audience, “The attack in Jerusalem [in which the three-month old baby was killed and eight others injured, three critically] is a clear result of those educating the younger generation in the Palestinian Authority to hate and eradicate Jews. Since its birth, The Palestinian Authority has never adopted a culture of peace, but rather a culture of incitement and Jihad against the Jews” (“Defense Minister: PA Never Had a Culture of Peace”, Arutz Sheva, October 23, 2014).

Jews in Israel understand what Ya’alon means. The Palestinian Authority never talks about peace. Instead, it demonizes Israel every chance it gets.

The world doesn’t care. It doesn’t care what Jews think, see or know. They only thing they seem to care about is what the so-called ‘Palestinians’ say and demand.

The G-d of Israel has a Story for you. It’s the Story of the Final Jewish Redemption. It’s a Story that will be filled with miracles and wonders.

Do you think Europe’s support of Arab Jew-hate will play a role in that Story?

Stay tuned. The G-d of Israel won’t disappoint you.

 

Once again, Hamas fills the world

Parshat Noach, the Torah Portion we will read on Shabbat, October 25, 2014, relates to us that the generation of Noach was corrupt. The earth, we are told, had become filled with hamas (Breisheet 6:11).

That word, ‘hamas’, is difficult to translate. Some translate it as crime (The Living Torah, Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, 1981). Some translate it as robbery (The ArtScroll Chumash, 1996). Some translate it as violence (Holy Scriptures, Jewish Publication Society, 1962). Some translate it as injustice (The ArtScroll Ramban, 2007).

Altogether, ‘hamas’ suggests a moral depravity that corrupted the entire world. It suggests a world-view that supported and perhaps even ennobled crime, robbery and violence. It suggests a world filled with duplicity, fraud, abuse, lies and degradation. It suggests a community where violence was everywhere and injustice was universal.

Because of that ‘hamas’, G-d destroyed the earth. He brought a Flood that devastated everything everywhere. If there’s a moral lesson here, it’s that injustice, violence, lies and fraud don’t bring peace; they bring destruction.

The ‘hamas’ of the Torah is, in other words, a perfect characterization of the modern Hamas which controls Gaza. This new Hamas is utterly corrupt (“Hamas corruption weighs heavily on Gaza”, The Daily Star [Lebanon], October 1, 2012). Its abuse of its own citizens is legendary (“Hamas is leading Palestine down the road of carnage”, The Telegraph, August 2009).  It dedicates itself to racism, dehumanization, demonization, ethnic cleansing and the annihilation of a homogeneous group (Jews).

If such a characterization of Hamas shocks you, read their Charter. It’s all there.

According to Hamas and its partner-in-government, the Palestinian Authority (PA), the nations of the world support their goals (“U.N. General Assembly votes to recognize Palestinian state”, CBS News, November 30, 2012). These goals include not simply statehood, but also the take-over of Israel and the removal of all Jews from it (again, see their Charters). The ‘peace’ these Muslims seek —which the world supports—is the ‘peace’ that will descend upon the Middle East after the ‘Zionist entity’—Jewish Israel--has been removed from the world map.

If that statement shocks you, read the PLO Charter. Look at Article 22. It’s all there.

The Hamas-PA Unity government bases its case on a call for a ‘just peace’ for ‘Palestinians (“Full transcript of Abbas speech at UN General Assembly”, Haaretz, September 26, 2014). That ‘just peace’ requires the ‘liberation’ of ‘Palestine’ –that is, all of Israel.

This call for ‘liberation’ is also in Article 22 of the PLO Charter. That’s where these Muslims call the extermination of Israel their ‘just struggle’.

The world agrees with this.

For example, the Pope, leader of more than a billion Catholics, has brought his moral authority to the Muslim effort to destroy Israel. In a recent trip to the ‘Holy Land’ (not Israel), he called for Catholics and Muslims to join together for ‘justice and peace’ (“Pope Calls for Christian-Muslim Cooperation”, May 26, 2014).

That’s the same ‘justice and peace’ we have seen in the PLO and Hamas Charters. In these Charters, ‘justice and peace’ are code-words for, ‘how we will destroy Israel’.

With this single announcement, 1.2 billion Catholics and 1.6 billion Muslims officially teamed up. Their focus will be to bring ‘justice’ to a people who never existed. Their method will be to demonize and criminalize the Jewish State.

Think of the Pope’s action this way: a tiny minority of 6 million Jews, living in a sea of almost 350 million Arab Muslims, is considered the oppressor of the Arab nation. These Jews, who live exclusively in one Middle East place that takes up less than one per cent of land of the Middle East, are called the people who have ‘stolen’ Muslim land. They have no right to that land. They have no moral standing in that land.

How curious. Judaism, and the nation-state of the Jewish Judea, existed for perhaps 2,000 years before Islam was started. It existed for perhaps 1,400 years before Christianity. Jews lived, walked and built upon the land of Israel for 2,000 years before any Muslim set foot here. Jews lived, walked and built upon this land for perhaps 1,400 years before any Christians walked here.

Nevertheless, the leader of 1.2 billion Catholics has joined with 1.6 billion Muslims to support and promote the claim that Jews today have usurped Muslim land.

Truly, justice has been perverted. Just as truly, Hamas once again fills the world.

The G-d of Israel has a Story He wants you to see. That Story is the Redemption of the Jewish people.

‘Hamas’ will play a part in that Story. Can you picture how?

Stay tuned. The G-d of Israel will not disappoint you.